首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Cultural Differences in Interpersonal Emotion Regulation
【24h】

Cultural Differences in Interpersonal Emotion Regulation

机译:人际情感监管中的文化差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Cultural differences exist in the use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies, but the focus to date has been on intrapersonal ER strategies such as cognitive reappraisal. An emerging literature highlights the importance of interpersonal ER, which utilizes social cues to facilitate the regulation of emotional states. In cultures that place high value on social interconnectedness as integral to their collectivistic self-construal, including East Asian cultures, interpersonal ER strategies may be particularly effective in reducing negative affect but this has not been previously tested. In this study, two groups comprising East Asian (n = 48) and Western European (n = 38) participants were randomly assigned to receive a priming narration depicting the use of either interpersonal (e.g. social modelling, perspective taking) or intrapersonal (e.g. cognitive reappraisal) ER strategies during a stressful experience. They were then instructed to utilize similar ER strategies in an emotion reactivity task during which they viewed high arousing negative pictorial stimuli while their heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (high frequency power – HF-HRV) and subjective affective states were measured. First we found that the East Asian group reported higher use of self-reported interpersonal ER strategies of social modelling and perspective taking in daily life. During the experimental interpersonal prime exposure, the East Asian group showed elevated HF-HRV (relative to baseline) compared to the Western European group, indicating more adaptive emotion regulation, but this pattern was not sustained during the reactivity or recovery phases. Instead, the East Asian group demonstrated increased HF-HRV and decreased HR across both prime conditions. The East Asian group also showed greater decreases in positive affect across the course of the experiment. Furthermore, individual differences in social modelling and individualism moderated the effect of the ER prime in the East Asian group, and main effects for perspective taking and reappraisal were observed in the Western European group. The findings support the notion that engaging in interpersonal ER strategies may be more beneficial for East Asian groups when immediately exposed to a stressful situation, as these strategies are congruent with cultural context and preferences, but our priming methodology may have limited the longer-term benefits.
机译:情感规则(ER)策略的使用情况存在文化差异,但迄今为止的重点是对核心态度的策略,如认知重复。一个新兴文献突出了人际关系的重要性,这利用社会提示来促进情绪状态的监管。在文化中,将社会互连的高价值与其集体主义自我混凝土(包括东亚文化为或缺),人际关系ER策略在减少负面影响方面可能特别有效,但这尚未测试过。在这项研究中,随机分配了包括东亚(n = 48)和西欧(n = 38)参与者的两组,以接收描述使用人际关系(例如社交建模,透视拍摄)或脑内部(例如认知)使用的启动叙述重新评估)在压力经历中的策略。然后指示它们在情绪反应性任务中使用类似的ER策略,在其在其心率(HR),心率变异性(高频功率 - HF-HRV)和主观情感状态下观看了高唤起阴性图刺激。首先,我们发现东亚集团报告了日常生活中的自我报告的人际关系态度策略的利用更高。在实验人际关系曝光期间,与西欧组相比,东亚组显示HF-HRV(相对于基线),表明更适应性的情绪调节,但在反应性或恢复阶段不持续这种模式。相反,东亚集团在两个主要条件下表现出HF-HRV的增加和人力资源。东亚集团在实验过程中也表现出更大的影响。此外,社会建模和个人主义的个体差异调节了ER亚洲群体在东亚集团中的效果,在西欧集团中观察到透视饲养和重新评估的主要效果。这些调查结果支持,在立即暴露于压力局势时,从事人际关系策略的概念可能对东亚群体更有利,因为这些策略与文化背景和偏好一致,但我们的启动方法可能限制了长期福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号