首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Cultural Differences in Interpersonal Emotion Regulation
【2h】

Cultural Differences in Interpersonal Emotion Regulation

机译:人际情感调节中的文化差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cultural differences exist in the use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies, but the focus to date has been on intrapersonal ER strategies such as cognitive reappraisal. An emerging literature highlights the importance of interpersonal ER, which utilizes social cues to facilitate the regulation of emotional states. In cultures that place high value on social interconnectedness as integral to their collectivistic self-construal, including East Asian cultures, interpersonal ER strategies may be particularly effective in reducing negative affect but this has not been previously tested. In this study, two groups comprising East Asian (n = 48) and Western European (n = 38) participants were randomly assigned to receive a priming narration depicting the use of either interpersonal (e.g., social modeling, perspective taking) or intrapersonal (e.g., cognitive reappraisal) ER strategies during a stressful experience. They were then instructed to utilize similar ER strategies in an emotion reactivity task during which they viewed high arousing negative pictorial stimuli while their heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (high frequency power – HF-HRV) and subjective affective states were measured. First we found that the East Asian group reported higher use of interpersonal ER strategies of social modeling and perspective taking in daily life. During the experimental interpersonal prime exposure, the East Asian group showed elevated HF-HRV (relative to baseline) compared to the Western European group, indicating more adaptive ER, but this pattern was not sustained during the reactivity or recovery phases. Instead, the East Asian group demonstrated increased HF-HRV and decreased HR across both prime conditions. The East Asian group also showed greater decreases in positive affect across the course of the experiment. Furthermore, individual differences in social modeling and individualistic self-construal moderated the effect of the ER prime in the East Asian group at trend levels, and main effects for perspective taking and reappraisal were observed in the Western European group. The findings support the notion that engaging in interpersonal ER strategies may be more beneficial for East Asian groups when immediately exposed to a stressful situation, as these strategies are congruent with cultural context and preferences, but our priming methodology may have limited the longer-term benefits.
机译:在使用情绪调节(ER)策略时存在文化差异,但是迄今为止,重点一直放在个人内在ER策略上,例如认知重新评估。新兴文学突显了人际关系ER的重要性,它利用社会线索促进情绪状态的调节。在将社会联系作为其集体自我建构不可或缺的一部分的文化(包括东亚文化)中,人际关系教育策略在减少负面影响方面可能特别有效,但这尚未经过测试。在这项研究中,由东亚(n = 48)和西欧(n = 38)参与者组成的两组被随机分配来接受启动叙述,描述使用人际交往(例如,社交模型,观点取景)或人际交往(例如, ,认知再评估)在压力经历中的ER策略。然后指示他们在情绪反应任务中使用类似的ER策略,在此过程中,他们观察了引起强烈的负面图片刺激,同时测量了他们的心率(HR),心率变异性(高频功率– HF-HRV)和主观情感状态。首先,我们发现东亚小组报告了在日常生活中更多使用人际关系ER策略的社会模型和观点。在实验性的人际主要接触中,东亚组的HF-HRV(相对于基线水平)高于西欧组,表明更具有适应性的ER,但这种模式在反应或恢复阶段并未持续。相反,东亚组在两种主要情况下均表现出HF-HRV升高和HR降低。在整个实验过程中,东亚组的积极影响也有所减少。此外,社会模型的个体差异和个人主义的自我建构在趋势水平上缓和了东亚地区ER质素的影响,并且在西欧地区观察到了观点采择和重新评估的主要影响。这些发现支持了这样的观点,即人际关系应急战略在立即面临压力时可能更有利于东亚群体,因为这些战略与文化背景和偏好相吻合,但是我们的启动方法可能会限制长期利益。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号