首页> 外文期刊>Scientific reports. >Adherence to guideline recommendations for coronary angiography in a poor South-East Asian setting: Impact on short- and medium-term clinical outcomes
【24h】

Adherence to guideline recommendations for coronary angiography in a poor South-East Asian setting: Impact on short- and medium-term clinical outcomes

机译:在贫困东南亚环境中遵守冠状动脉造影的指南建议:对短期和中期临床结果的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

In South-East Asian populations and particularly in Indonesia, access to coronary angiography (CAG) is limited. We aimed to assess the adherence for undergoing CAG for indicated patients, according to the guideline recommendations. We then examined whether this adherence would have an impact on patients' short- and medium-term mortality and morbidity. We consecutively enrolled 474 patients with acute and stable coronary artery disease who had indication for CAG at Makassar Cardiac Center, Indonesia from February 2013 to December 2014. We found that adherence to CAG recommendation in poor South-East Asian setting is low. Of 474 recommended patients, only 273 (57.6%) underwent the procedure. Factors for not undergoing CAG were: older age, female gender, low educational and socio-economic status, and insurance type. While reasons for patients refusing CAG and subsequent intervention included fear, symptoms reduction, and lack of trust concerning the procedure benefit. During follow-up (median 19 (IQR 6-39.3) months), 155 (32.7%) patients died, and 259 (54.6%) experienced at least one adverse event. Adherence to CAG recommendation was associated with a significantly lower short- and medium-term mortality, independent of revascularization and other potential confounders. In sub-group analysis, adhered patients "with revascularization" had significantly better outcomes compared to the "non-revascularization" and "not?adhere" groups.
机译:在东南亚人口,特别是在印度尼西亚,获得冠状动脉造影(CAG)的机会受到限制。根据指南建议,我们旨在评估表明患者接受CAG的依从性。然后,我们检查了这种依从性是否会对患者的短期和中期死亡率和发病率产生影响。我们连续注册474例急性稳定冠状动脉疾病患者,患者于2013年2月至2014年12月在印度尼西亚达麦卡萨尔Cardiac中心征集CAG。我们发现,在贫困东南亚环境中坚持CAG推荐。在474名推荐的患者中,只有273(57.6%)介绍了该程序。不接受消除衰退的因素是:年龄较大的年龄,女性性别,低教育和社会经济地位,保险类型。虽然拒绝CAG和随后的干预患者的患者的原因包括恐惧,症状减少,并且缺乏关于程序效益的信任。在随访期间(中位数19(IQR 6-39.3)月份),155名(32.7%)患者死亡,259名(54.6%)经历了至少一个不良事件。遵守CAG推荐与显着降低的短期和中期死亡率,与血运重建和其他潜在的混淆无关。在亚组分析中,与“非血运重建”和“不吻合”群体相比,粘附的患者“患有血运重建”具有明显更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号