首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Propofol vs Sevoflurane in General and Cognitive Recovery from Anaesthesia in Day Care Surgery- A Randomised Clinical Trial
【24h】

Propofol vs Sevoflurane in General and Cognitive Recovery from Anaesthesia in Day Care Surgery- A Randomised Clinical Trial

机译:异丙酚与七氟脲一般和认知恢复来自白天护理手术的麻醉 - 一种随机临床试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Rapid emergence from anaesthesia and postoperative recovery of cognitive function is one of the most important requirements of a day care surgery. Propofol is a nearideal intravenous anaesthetic agent for day care surgeries due to its pharmacological properties. Similarly, amongst inhalational anaesthetic agents, sevoflurane is the preferred agent due to low blood-gas solubility.Aim: To evaluate sevoflurane and propofol for general and psychomotor recovery profile in day care anaesthesia techniques.Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical trial was conducted at GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab after getting approval by Institutional Ethical Committee. A total of 70 American society of Anaesthesiologistsa?? (ASA) Grade I and II patients aged 18-60 years, scheduled to undergo elective day care surgery under general anaesthesia were enrolled. In group A (n=35) anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg intravenously and maintained with variable-rate propofol infusion. In group B (n=35) anaesthesia was induced with sevoflurane 8% and maintained with sevoflurane. In both the groups general {mean time to remove Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA), emergence, time to responds to commands, mean orientation time} and psychomotor recovery profile was evaluated using unpaired studenta??s t-test and Chi-square test.Results: Mean Time to remove LMA in Group B was earlier being 5.30 ±1.23 minutes vs 8.65 ±2.40 minutes in group A (p<0.001). Mean emergence time in Group B was 5.83 ±1.23 minutes and in Group A was 8.87±2.42 minutes (p<0.001). Time to respond to commands in Group B was 6.81 ±1.39 minutes and in Group A was 10.01 ±2.52 minutes (p<0.001). Mean Orientation time in Group B was 7.15 ±1.53 minutes and in Group A was 10.76±2.61 minutes (p<0.001). Psychomotor recovery was also faster with sevoflurane as compared to propofol.Conclusion: Both sevoflurane and propofol are useful agents for day care surgery. Sevoflurane provides a rapid return of psychomotor and cognitive ability as compared to propofol.
机译:麻醉和术后认知功能的快速出现是一日儿科手术的最重要要求之一。 Purfofol是由于其药理学特性的日间护理手术的附近静脉麻醉剂。类似地,在吸气的麻醉剂中,由于低血液气体溶解度,七氟醚是优选的试剂。目的:在日科麻醉技术中评估七氟醚和异丙酚用于一般和精神运动恢复概况。材料和方法:这在制度伦理委员会获得批准后,在GGS医学院和医院进行了随机的临床试验,在旁遮普委员会审批。共有70家AAAESTHELIOLOGYSA的美国学会? (ASA)18-60岁的I和II患者,预定在全身麻醉下进行选修日保健手术进行注册。在A组中(n = 35)静脉内用异丙酚2mg / kg诱导麻醉,并保持可变速率的异丙酚输注。在B组(n = 35)中,用七氟醚诱导麻醉,8%并用七氟醚维持。在群体中,{平均时间去除喉部掩模气道(LMA),出现,使用未配对的学生的T检验和Chi-square测试评估响应命令的时间,均衡时间}和精神振动率恢复概况。 结果:B组中的LMA的平均时间早期为5.30±1.23分钟,A组A中8.65±2.40分钟(P <0.001)。 B组的平均出苗时间为5.83±1.23分钟,A组为8.87±2.42分钟(P <0.001)。响应B组命令的时间为6.81±1.39分钟,A组为10.01±2.52分钟(P <0.001)。 B组的平均定向时间为7.15±1.53分钟,A组为10.76±2.61分钟(P <0.001)。与异丙酚相比,精神热恢复也与七氟烷相比更快。结论:七氟醚和异丙酚都是日间护理手术的有用药剂。与异丙酚相比,七氟烷提供了精神多仪和认知能力的快速回报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号