首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Relationship between Bispectral Index and Observer's Assessment of Awareness/Sedation Score during Onset of Sedation: Study with Midazolam, Propofol and Dexmedetomidine
【24h】

Relationship between Bispectral Index and Observer's Assessment of Awareness/Sedation Score during Onset of Sedation: Study with Midazolam, Propofol and Dexmedetomidine

机译:Bispectral指数与观察者在镇静发作期间对意识/镇静评估的关系:咪达唑仑,丙唑和德克梅哌咪唑研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Supplementation of sedation along with regional anaesthesia is a good practice to reduce anxiety and amnesia related to surgery. Monitoring the level of sedation is important to prevent excessive sedation. Propofol, midazolam and dexmedetomidine have been studied individually using either BIS index or OAA/S scale.Aim: To compare the time of onset of sedation for propofol, midazolam and dexmedetomidine using both Bispectral index monitor and simultaneous clinical assessment.Materials and Methods: Ninety patients of ASA Grade I and II, of either sex and aged 20-60 years scheduled for lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups (n=30). After subarachnoid block, when sensory block reached T-10 level, sedation was started using either propofol (Group P), midazolam (Group M) or dexmedetomidine (Group D) and level of sedation was assessed using BIS monitor and OAA/S scale. The dose of sedation was titrated to maintain BIS value between 60-75. Time to reach BIS value 70 and OAA/S score 3, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, BIS value, OAA/s score and complications were recorded.Results: The Spearman’s correlation between time to reach BIS score 70 and OAA/S score 3 in Group P, Group M, Group D were 0.925, 0.211 and 0.512, respectively with p-values of 0.022, 0.133 and 0.163, respectively. The time to reach BIS score 70 was significantly less in Group P as compared to Group D and Group M (6.00±1.87 minutes v/s 7.97±1.62 minutes and 12.23±1.92 minutes). The time to reach OAA/S score 3 was significantly less in Group P as compared to Group M and Group D (6.27±1.92 minutes v/s 12.77±3.19 minutes and 15.20±2.69 minutes).Conclusion: A poor correlation was found between clinical observation and EEG based monitor while assessing sedation using dexmedetomidine and midazolam. On the other hand, a better correlation was observed when propofol was used. Onset of sedation was earlier with propofol compared to dexmedetomidine and midazolam.
机译:镇静与区域麻醉的补充是一种良好的做法,可以减少与手术有关的焦虑和遗忘。监测镇静水平对于防止过度镇静是重要的。使用双指数或OAA / s刻度单独研究异丙酚,咪达唑仑和右甲酰胺。目的:使用双光谱指数显示器和同时临床评估比较镇静镇静的镇静的时间。材料和方法:在脊髓麻醉下为脊髓麻醉下的下肢手术的性别和年龄为2岁的ASA等级和II患者被将随机分配为三组(n = 30)。在蛛网膜下腔块后,当感觉块达到T-10水平时,使用双溴酚(P组),咪达唑仑(M)或甲酰嘌呤(D)和镇静水平开始使用BIS监测和OAA / S级进行镇静。滴定镇静剂量以维持60-75之间的双值。达到BIS值70和OAA / S得分3,记录了术中血液动力学参数,BIS值,OAA / S分数和并发症。结果:Spearman之间的相关时间来达到BIS评分70和OAA / S分数3在P组中,群体M,D组D分别为0.022,0.13和0.163的p值分别为0.925,0.211和0.512。与D组和M组(6.00±1.87分钟v / s 7.97±1.62分钟和12.23±1.92分钟)相比,P组P分数70的时间在P组中显着较低。与M和C组和D组(6.27±1.92分钟V / s 12.77±3.19分钟和15.20±2.69分钟)相比,对P组oAA / s得分3的时间显着较低。结论:相关性差在临床观察和基于EEG的显示器之间发现,同时使用Dexmedetomidine和Midazolam评估镇静剂。另一方面,当使用异丙酚时观察到更好的相关性。与Dexmedetomidine和MidazoLam相比,镇静的发病早期含有异丙酚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号