首页> 外文期刊>Procedia Computer Science >Disruptions in the Process of Engineering Education - A Curriculum Design Perspective
【24h】

Disruptions in the Process of Engineering Education - A Curriculum Design Perspective

机译:工程教育过程中断 - 课程设计视角

获取原文
           

摘要

Engineering Education, today, is on the crossroads of uncertainty mainly due to the over flooding of information through the digital media leading to reduced demand for Engineering. Institutions find it very challenging to attract students and this is the right time to identify the right approach to improve the quality of education imparted by them. Technical institutions in our country are evaluated by accrediting bodies like the NBA and NAAC and Engineering aspirants select a college based on the accreditation status. Each accrediting body has its own methodology and it is difficult to face all of them simultaneously.Today, engineering education is losing its charm mainly because the youngsters are no longer attracted to pursue Engineering. This leads to a lot of vacant seats in many colleges forcing them to either close the institution. However, the demand for quality Engineer is very high and industries are in need of talented and versatile professionals. This forces the colleges to adapt various innovative schemes and procedures with the support of the following accrediting bodies like NBA, NAAC and NIRF. Outcome based approach is adapted by the accrediting agencies and hence irrespective of the accrediting agency, institutions should develop innovative approaches to the system with the main focus toward learning outcomes.Learning is categorized into knowledge, skills and attitude as Bloom’s Taxonomy. These learning outcomes are attained by designing various courses for students. All courses are designed with measurable course outcomes. Courses can have sub-outcomes for detailed tasks designed for the students. All course outcomes can be mapped to knowledge (Cognitive domain), skills (Psychomotor domain) and attitude (Affective domain). The courses and their outcomes are designed to attain program outcomes.Engineering education is made up of various formats of courses like lectures, seminars, workshops, tutorials, laboratory, elective courses, self-learning courses, projects, discussions, personality development courses, soft skill courses, social science courses, extra-curricular activities and sports activities. Outcomes of these courses focus on the knowledge, skills and attitude required for employability.The proposed work analyses the various types of courses that can be included in the curriculum design engineering education. We identify the disruptions for each type of course and its impact on the three domains. Courses designed without effective learning outcomes that cannot be precisely measured will not contribute to the attainment of the course and the program outcomes. It can be concluded that all activities and courses conducted for the engineering education should be designed with a precise measurable outcome and its assessment metrics should be clearly defined.
机译:今天,工程教育是在不确定性的十字路口上,主要是由于通过数字媒体的信息洪水淹没,导致工程需求降低。机构发现吸引学生非常具有挑战性,这是确定提高他们赋予其赋予教育质量的正确方法的正确方法。我国的技术机构由NBA和NAAC和工程霍尔等认证机构评估,根据认证状态选择一所大学。每个认证的身体都有自己的方法,很难同时面对所有这些。它主要是因为年轻人不再被吸引到追求工程而导致其魅力。这导致许多大学中的大量空置座位强迫他们关闭机构。然而,对优质工程师的需求是非常高的,行业需要有才华和多功能的专业人才。这迫使大学改善各种创新方案和程序,并支持以下对NBA,NAAC和NIRF等认证机构的支持。基于结果的方法由认证机构适应,因此无论认证机构如何,机构都应为该系统制定创新方法,主要关注学习成果。图解为盛开的分类而分为知识,技能和态度。通过为学生设计各种课程来实现这些学习结果。所有课程都设计有可衡量的课程结果。课程可以为为学生设计的详细任务有子结果。所有课程结果都可以映射到知识(认知领域),技能(精神电机域)和态度(情感领域)。课程及其结果旨在获得方案成果。工程教育由各种格式的讲师,研讨会,研讨会,教程,实验室,选修课程,自学课程,项目,讨论,人格开发课程,柔软技能课程,社会科学课程,课外活动和体育活动。这些课程的结果侧重于就业性所需的知识,技能和态度。拟议的工作分析了可以包含在课程设计工程教育中的各种类型的课程。我们确定每种类型的遗传课程及其对三个域的影响。没有有效学习结果的课程无法精确衡量,不会有助于实现课程和计划结果。可以得出结论,工程教育所进行的所有活动和课程都应以精确的可衡量结果为设计,并且应明确定义其评估指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号