首页> 外文期刊>Procedia Computer Science >Disrupting Engineering Education: Beyond Peace Engineering to Educating Engineers for Justice
【24h】

Disrupting Engineering Education: Beyond Peace Engineering to Educating Engineers for Justice

机译:扰乱工程教育:超越和平工程向教育工程师进行正义

获取原文
       

摘要

Engineering education outcomes as prescribed by the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology comprise technical and scientific student educational outcomes as well as “soft skills”. The scientific and technical outcomes ensure that engineering graduates possess the requisite science, math, engineering and technology skills and capabilities that will enable them to practice competently in their disciplinary engineering profession with technical, scientific and engineering rigor. Soft skills, on the other hand, which are being increasingly emphasized as critically necessary for engineering graduates to be employable and successful in the professional workspace, focus on teamwork, communication, ethics, global awareness (including social, economic, environmental and global impacts of engineering), and lifelong learning. In this essay, we posit that migrating engineering education towards “peace engineering” not only requires that faculty place increased emphasis on these soft skills, but also needs the incorporation of true impact analyses – much like an Environmental Impact Assessment – on the social, environmental and economic impacts of the solutions that students develop to engineering projects and problems. This impact analysis must go beyond an assessment of those areas mentioned in the conference’s informal definition of “peace engineering”, which identifies components including “…promotion of prosperity, sustainability, social equality and diversity, culture of equality, ethics, innovation and entrepreneurship.” While these issues are critically important for promoting and supporting an ethos of peace engineering, we suggest that they will have minimal impact unless the thinking and analyses extends to focus onjustice, extending the justice paradigm from civil, social and environmental justice to include energy justice, resource justice, information justice and technology justice. Exposing engineering students to these concepts and ideas and incorporating the notion of justice into the impacts of technology research, development and implementation will move us from a “war” based socio-technological configuration to a global peace engineering agenda that might actually move us towards engineers educated to transform their world for peace and justice.
机译:认证工程和技术认证委员会规定的工程教育结果包括技术和科学学生教育结果以及“软技能”。科学和技术成果确保工程毕业生拥有必要的科学,数学,工程和技术技能和能力,使他们能够与技术,科学和工程严谨的纪律工程专业竞争态度。另一方面,软技能越来越强调为工程毕业生在专业工作空间中可用和成功的批评性,重点关注团队合作,沟通,道德,全球意识(包括社会,经济,环境和全球影响工程)和终身学习。在本文中,我们认为工程教育迁移到“和平工程”不仅要求教师的地方会增加这些软技能,而且需要纳入真正的影响分析 - 非常像环境影响评估 - 对社会,环境的环境影响学生发展到工程项目和问题的解决方案的经济影响。这种影响分析必须超出对会议上提到的“和平工程”的非正式定义中提到的那些地区的评估,该区域确定了“......促进繁荣,可持续性,社会平等和多样性,平等文化,伦理,创新和企业家的组成部分。 “虽然这些问题对于促进和支持和平工程的欧洲人体来说令人统治性很重要,但除非思考和分析延伸到焦点宣称,否则它们将具有最小的影响,从民事,社会和环境司法延伸到包括能源正义的司法范式,资源司法,信息司法和技术正义。将工程学生暴露在这些概念和想法中,并将正义概念纳入技术研究,发展和实施的影响,将我们从一个基于“战争”的社会 - 技术配置向全球和平工程议程移动,这可能实际上将我们转向工程师教育以改变他们的和平与正义的世界。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号