...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Surrogacy of intermediate endpoints for overall survival in randomized controlled trials of first-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma in the pre- and post-pazopanib era: a meta-analytic evaluation
【24h】

Surrogacy of intermediate endpoints for overall survival in randomized controlled trials of first-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma in the pre- and post-pazopanib era: a meta-analytic evaluation

机译:在Pazopanib前后软组织Sarcoma中随机对照试验中的中间终点的替代性中间终点的替代性术语和Pazopanib时代的先进软组织Sarca:Meta-Inalytic评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Overall survival is the true endpoint for most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of malignant tumors, whereas progression-free survival (PFS) is considered the most reliable surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS). The present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between surrogate endpoints and OS in randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy with doxorubicin (DOX), the standard treatment for advanced and metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (ASTS), using a meta-analytic approach. In a systematic review, we identified RCTs of first-line chemotherapy for ASTS that compared single-agent doxorubicin (DOX) with other chemotherapy regimens, and were published in English during January 1974-December 2017. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of first-line treatments for ASTS. Surrogacy of the intermediate endpoints for OS was investigated using weighted linear regression analysis. Correlation strength was examined using the coefficient of determination (R2). Twenty-seven randomized trials, comprising 6156 patients (3371 patients in the experimental arm and 2785 patients in the DOX arm) were identified. The hazard ratios for OS and PFS showed that the efficacy of treatment for ASTS was not significantly different between standard DOX and experimental treatments. The median OS was significantly prolonged in RCTs published after 2012 when pazopanib was approved for treating ASTS. The median PFS, however, did not differ significantly. The correlation between PFS and OS was moderate (R2?=?0.557), but better than that between OS and 3-month PFS, 6-month PFS, and response rate (R2?=?0.200, 0.073, and 0.278, respectively). The correlation between PFS and OS tended to be more favorable in RCTs published after 2012 (R2?=?0.586 and 0.459, respectively). The trial-level correlation between PFS and OS was only modest; it tended to be better in RCTs published after 2012. While the effective lines of chemotherapy and the introduction of new drugs prolonged OS but not PFS, PFS is a better surrogate than other intermediate endpoints in the first-line ASTS trials even in the post-pazopanib era. Although this does not negate the need for more reliable surrogate endpoints for OS.
机译:整体存活是恶性肿瘤最随机对照试验(RCT)的真实终点,而无进展生存(PFS)被认为是整体存活率最可靠的代理终点(OS)。本研究旨在评估使用荟萃分析方法的多柔比星(DOX)的一线化疗随机试验中的替代终点和OS在一线化疗中的随机试验中的相关性,采用荟萃分析方法,对先进和转移性组织肉瘤(ASTS)的标准治疗。在系统审查中,我们确定了对ASTS的一线化疗的RCT,与其他化疗方案相比,将单孕单催化剂(DOX)与其他化疗方案进行了比较,并于2017年1月至12月在英语中公布。进行了荟萃分析以评估一线治疗对ASTS的功效。使用加权线性回归分析研究了OS的中间端点的替代性。使用测定系数(R2)检查相关强度。鉴定了二十七项随机试验,包括6156名患者(实验手臂3371名患者和Dox Arm中的2785名患者)。 OS和PFS的危险比表明,标准DOX和实验治疗之间的AST治疗的疗效没有显着差异。当Pazopanib批准治疗ASTS时,中位OS​​在2012年后发表的RCT延长了。然而,中位数PFS没有显着差异。 PFS和OS之间的相关性适中(R2?= 0.557),但优于OS和3个月PFS之间,6个月PFS和响应率(R2?= 0.200,0.200,0.278)之间更好。 PFS和OS之间的相关性在2012年后发表的RCT(R2?= 0.586和0.459)更有利。 PFS和OS之间的试验级相关性仅适度;在2012年后发表的RCT趋于更好。虽然有效化疗的有效素线和新药物的引入延长了OS但不是PFS,但PFS是一种比第一行ASTS试验中的其他中间端点更好的代理,即使在后期Pazopanib时代。虽然这不会否定对操作系统更可靠的代理端点的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号