...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes therapy >Comparison of Blood Glucose Variability Between Exenatide and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Chinese Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial
【24h】

Comparison of Blood Glucose Variability Between Exenatide and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Chinese Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial

机译:用二甲双胍单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者艾塞那肽和双相胰岛素Aspart 30在中国参与者中的血糖变异性比较:多中心,开放标签,随机试验

获取原文

摘要

IntroductionTo compare blood glucose variability (GV) in Chinese participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) whose blood glucose levels are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy after twice-daily exenatide or biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30).MethodsIn this 16-week multicenter, randomized clinical trial, 104 participants were randomized 1:1 to receive exenatide (exenatide group) or BIAsp30 (BIAsp30 group) twice daily. All participants continued metformin treatment. The primary outcome was the change in GV as measured by a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) from baseline to 16?weeks.ResultsAt 16?weeks, both the Exenatide and BIAsp30 groups effectively decreased mean glucose (MG), but neither group changed the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), largest amplitude of glycemic excursion (LAGE), mean of daily difference (MODD), or standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG). The decrease in 2-h post-breakfast glucose excursions was greater in the Exenatide group compared to the BIAsp30 group, with a least square (LS) mean difference [95% CI] of (1.58 [0.53, 2.63]). Exenatide also significantly reduced 2-h post-lunch glucose excursion compared to BIAsp30 (LS mean difference [95% CI], 1.19 [0.18, 2.20]). The Exenatide group had significantly reduced body weight and body mass index (BMI), while the BIAsp30 group had increased weight and had no change in BMI. Both treatments were well tolerated with no serious hypoglycemic events and with fewer identified hypoglycemic events in the Exenatide group than in the BIAsp30 group (5.77% vs. 17.31%, P ?0.01).ConclusionAlthough there was no difference in change of GV between Exenatide and BIAsp30, exenatide provided more improvement in postprandial glucose excursion and weight control, without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia in Chinese patients with T2DM whose blood glucose was inadequately controlled with metformin. These findings may provide new options for patients who choose further hypoglycemic treatment, especially in patients with obesity who have large postprandial plasma glucose excursions.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov indentifier: NCT02449603.
机译:将血糖变异(GV)与2型糖尿病(T2DM)进行比较,其血糖水平与二甲双胍单药治疗不充分控制两次exenatide或双相胰岛素Aspart 30(BiSP30).Methodsin这16周的多中心,随机临床试验,104名参与者随机1:1,每天两次接受exenatide(Exenatide Group)或百血限(百分之一的百分之一组)。所有参与者都继续进行二甲双胍治疗。主要结果是通过从基线到16?TAY的连续葡萄糖监测系统(CGMS)测量的GV的变化。蛋白酰胺和百分之三,艾塞司和偏压30组有效地降低了平均葡萄糖(MG),但既未改变平均血糖偏移(法师),血糖偏移(鼠)的最大振幅,日常差异(MODD)的平均值,或血糖的标准偏差(SDBG)。与百分比的30组相比,eNEnatide组2-H后早餐后葡萄糖偏移的减少更大,具有最小二乘(LS)平均差异[95%CI](1.58 [0.53,2.63])。与BiSP30相比,exenatide也显着降低了午餐后葡萄糖释放(LS平均值[95%CI],1.19 [0.18,20])。 eNEnatide组体重和体重指数(BMI)显着减少,而BIASP30组重量增加,BMI没有变化。两种治疗耐受良好的耐受性,没有严重的降血糖事件,并且在八烯烃组中没有鉴定的低血糖事件比百血限组合组(5.77%对17.31%,P <0.01)。结论exenatide之间的GV变化没有差异exenatide提供了更改善的餐后葡萄糖偏移和体重控制,而不增加中国血糖与二甲双胍不充分控制的T2DM患者低血糖的风险。这些发现可能为选择进一步降血糖治疗的患者提供新的选择,特别是在具有大型后血浆葡萄糖偏移的肥胖患者中.TirdritedClinictRials.gov Indentifier:NCT02449603。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号