首页> 外文期刊>Journal of diabetes investigation. >Subject‐driven titration of biphasic insulin aspart30 twice daily is non‐inferior to investigator‐driven titration in Chinese patients with type2 diabetes inadequately controlled with premixed human insulin: A randomized, open‐label, parallel‐group, multicenter trial
【24h】

Subject‐driven titration of biphasic insulin aspart30 twice daily is non‐inferior to investigator‐driven titration in Chinese patients with type2 diabetes inadequately controlled with premixed human insulin: A randomized, open‐label, parallel‐group, multicenter trial

机译:在受试者中预先混合人胰岛素控制不充分的2型糖尿病患者,每天两次两次进行的双相天冬氨酸30天天受试者驱动滴定不逊于研究者驱动滴定:一项随机,开放标签,平行分组,多中心试验

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractAims/IntroductionThe present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of subject-driven and investigator-driven titration of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) twice daily (BID).Materials and MethodsIn this 20-week, randomized, open-label, two-group parallel, multicenter trial, Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by premixed/self-mixed human insulin were randomized 1:1 to subject-driven or investigator-driven titration of BIAsp 30 BID, in combination with metformin and/or α-glucosidase inhibitors. Dose adjustment was decided by patients in the subject-driven group after training, and by investigators in the investigator-driven group.ResultsEligible adults (n = 344) were randomized in the study. The estimated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction was 14.5 mmol/mol (1.33%) in the subject-driven group and 14.3 mmol/mol (1.31%) in the investigator-driven group. Non-inferiority of subject-titration vs investigator-titration in reducing HbA1c was confirmed, with estimated treatment difference −0.26 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval −2.05, 1.53) (–0.02%, 95% confidence interval –0.19, 0.14). Fasting plasma glucose, postprandial glucose increment and self-measured plasma glucose were improved in both groups without statistically significant differences. One severe hypoglycemic event was experienced by one subject in each group. A similar rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia (events/patient-year) was reported in the subject-driven (1.10) and investigator-driven (1.32) groups. There were 64.5 and 58.1% patients achieving HbA1c 53.0 mmol/mol (7.0%), and 51.2 and 45.9% patients achieving the HbA1c target without confirmed hypoglycemia throughout the trial in the subject-driven and investigator-driven groups, respectively.ConclusionsSubject-titration of BIAsp 30 BID was as efficacious and well-tolerated as investigator-titration. The present study supported patients to self-titrate BIAsp 30 BID under physicians’ supervision.
机译:摘要目的/简介本研究旨在比较受试者驱使和研究者驱使的每日两次(BID)双相天冬氨酸30(BIAsp 30)滴定的有效性和安全性。在此为期20周的随机,开放标签的研究中,两组平行,多中心试验中,未预先混合/自混合人胰岛素控制不足的2型糖尿病中国患者,按1:1的比例随机分配至受试者驱动或研究人员驱动的BIAsp 30 BID联合二甲双胍和/或α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂。剂量调整由受试者驱动组的患者在训练后和研究人员驱动的组中决定。结果符合条件的成年人(n = 344)在研究中被随机分配。受试者驱动组的糖化血红蛋白(HbA 1c )估计减少量为14.5 mmol / mol(1.33%),研究者驱动组为14.3 mmol / mol(1.31%)。确认受试者滴定法和研究者滴定法在降低HbA 1c 方面的非劣效性,估计治疗差异为-0.26 mmol / mol(95%置信区间-2.05,1.53)(–0.02%,95 %置信区间–0.19,0.14)。两组的空腹血糖,餐后血糖增加和自测血浆葡萄糖均得到改善,但无统计学差异。每组中一名受试者经历了一次严重的降血糖事件。在受试者驱动(1.10)和研究者驱动(1.32)组中,夜间低血糖发生率(事件/患者年)相似。在整个过程中,有64.5%和58.1%的患者达到HbA 1c <53.0 mmol / mol(7.0%),51.2%和45.9%的患者达到HbA 1c 的目标且未确认低血糖结论BIAsp 30 BID的受试者滴定与研究者滴定一样有效且具有良好的耐受性。本研究支持患者在医生的监督下自行滴定BIAsp 30 BID。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号