首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry >Barriers and Facilitators Associated with the Management of Aggressive and Disruptive Behaviour in Children: A Qualitative Study with Pediatricians
【24h】

Barriers and Facilitators Associated with the Management of Aggressive and Disruptive Behaviour in Children: A Qualitative Study with Pediatricians

机译:与儿童侵略性和破坏性行为的管理相关的障碍和促进者:与儿科医生进行定性学

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Aggressive and disruptive behaviours are frequently observed in children. Short-term use of antipsychotics with monitoring for adverse effects is recommended when first-line interventions fail (e.g. psychosocial therapies and psychostimulants for ADHD). This study aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators to behavioural change for the management of aggressive and disruptive behaviours by pediatricians. Methods This was a qualitative study with twenty community-based pediatricians. An interview guide was developed to elicit beliefs associated with practice behaviours. We used thematic content analysis with the Theoretical Domains Framework to inform knowledge translation interventions, by helping to determine what behavioural barriers and facilitators to practice exist. Key domains which influenced behaviour were identified by evaluating the frequency of beliefs across interviews, conflicting beliefs, and the strength of beliefs impacting behaviour. Results Pediatricians described evaluating the impact of aggressive and disruptive behaviours, attempting to determine their cause, and using an approach that prioritized psychosocial therapies and psychostimulants. Pediatricians reported that antipsychotics were effective but that they experienced anxiety about harms, and there was a need to accept the adverse effects as a trade-off for improved function. Discontinuing antipsychotics was problematic. Despite awareness of antipsychotic-induced movement disorders and metabolic effects, there were limitations in physician skills, knowledge and resources and social influences that were a barrier to routine implementation of recommended monitoring procedures. Conclusions This study identifies barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice that can be used for knowledge translation interventions to ensure a high standard of care for children prescribed antipsychotics.
机译:在儿童中经常观察到侵略性和破坏性行为。当一线干预失败时建议使用短期使用抗抗精神来的抗抗衡症状,因为一线干预失败(例如,心理社会治疗和ADHD的精神疗法)。本研究旨在了解儿科医生侵略性和破坏性行为的行为变革的障碍和促进者。方法这是与二十个社区的儿科医生进行定性研究。开发了一个面试指南,以引发与实践行为相关的信念。我们利用主题内容分析与理论域名框架,通过帮助确定存在什么行为障碍和促进者来提供知识翻译干预措施。通过评估对面试,相互冲突的信念和信仰的力量影响行为的信仰频率来确定影响行为的关键领域。结果儿科医生描述了评估侵略性和破坏性行为的影响,试图确定其原因,并使用优先考虑的心理社会治疗和精神疗法的方法。儿科医生报告说,抗精神病学是有效的,但他们经历了对危害的焦虑,并且需要接受改善功能的权衡的不利影响。停止抗精神病药是有问题的。尽管认识到抗精神病药诱导的运动障碍和代谢效应,但医生技能,知识和资源以及社会影响的局限性是常规实施建议的监测程序的障碍。结论本研究将障碍和促进者识别出基于证据的实践,这些实践可用于知识翻译干预,以确保为抗精神病药具体的儿童提供高标准的护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号