...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pathology Informatics >Breast cancer prognostic factors in the digital era: Comparison of Nottingham grade using whole slide images and glass slides
【24h】

Breast cancer prognostic factors in the digital era: Comparison of Nottingham grade using whole slide images and glass slides

机译:数字时代的乳腺癌预后因素:使用整个幻灯片图像和玻璃载玻片的诺丁汉等级比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: To assess reproducibility and accuracy of overall Nottingham grade and component scores using digital whole slide images (WSIs) compared to glass slides. Methods: Two hundred and eight pathologists were randomized to independently interpret 1 of 4 breast biopsy sets using either glass slides or digital WSI. Each set included 5 or 6 invasive carcinomas (22 total invasive cases). Participants interpreted the same biopsy set approximately 9 months later following a second randomization to WSI or glass slides. Nottingham grade, including component scores, was assessed on each interpretation, providing 2045 independent interpretations of grade. Overall grade and component scores were compared between pathologists (interobserver agreement) and for interpretations by the same pathologist (intraobserver agreement). Grade assessments were compared when the format (WSI vs. glass slides) changed or was the same for the two interpretations. Results: Nottingham grade intraobserver agreement was highest using glass slides for both interpretations (73%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 68%, 78%) and slightly lower but not statistically different using digital WSI for both interpretations (68%, 95% CI: 61%, 75%; P = 0.22). The agreement was lowest when the format changed between interpretations (63%, 95% CI: 59%, 68%). Interobserver agreement was significantly higher ( P 0.001) using glass slides versus digital WSI (68%, 95% CI: 66%, 70% versus 60%, 95% CI: 57%, 62%, respectively). Nuclear pleomorphism scores had the lowest inter- and intra-observer agreement. Mitotic scores were higher on glass slides in inter- and intra-observer comparisons. Conclusions: Pathologists' intraobserver agreement (reproducibility) is similar for Nottingham grade using glass slides or WSI. However, slightly lower agreement between pathologists suggests that verification of grade using digital WSI may be more challenging.
机译:背景技术:与玻璃载玻片相比,评估使用数字整体幻灯片图像(WSIS)的整体诺丁汉等级和组件分数的再现性和准确性。方法:二百八名病理学家随机使用任何一种玻璃载玻片或数字WSI独立地解释4个乳房活检组中的1个。每组均包括5或6个侵入性癌(22例侵入性案例)。在对WSI或玻璃载玻片的第二个随机化之后,参与者将相同的活组织检查设置约9个月。在每次解释上评估诺丁汉等级,包括成分分数,提供2045年的年级独立解释。在病理学家(Interobserver协议)之间和同一病理学家(奥里替服务公司协议)之间的解释之间进行了总成绩和组成分数。在两个解释的格式(WSI与玻璃载玻片)变化或相同时比较级评估。结果:使用玻璃载玻片的解释(73%,95%置信区间[CI]:68%,78%)和使用数字WSI对两种解释(68%,95 %CI:61%,75%; p = 0.22)。当格式在解释之间发生变化时,协议最低(63%,95%:59%,68%)。使用玻璃载玻片与数码WSI(68%,95%CI:66%,70%,70%,95%CI:57%,62%,62%,62%,分别为6.5%,7.5%,7.5%,7.5%,7.5%,分别为62%)。核渗透学分数具有最低和观察内的观察员协议。在观察者间和观察者内比较的玻璃载玻片上的有丝分裂较高。结论:病理学家的奥特廷人协议(再现性)类似于使用玻璃载玻片或WSI的诺丁汉等级。然而,病理学家之间的协议略低,表明使用数字WSI的等级验证可能更具挑战性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号