首页> 外文期刊>Data in Brief >Data documenting the performance of the PT/INR line correction method for reconciling INR discrepancies between central laboratory coagulation analyzers using different thromboplastins during the evaluation of a portable Coagulometer
【24h】

Data documenting the performance of the PT/INR line correction method for reconciling INR discrepancies between central laboratory coagulation analyzers using different thromboplastins during the evaluation of a portable Coagulometer

机译:记录Pt / InR线路校正方法的性能,用于在便携式凝血仪评估期间使用不同凝血仪在中央实验室凝血分析仪之间进行差异差异

获取原文
       

摘要

The data presented here was produced as part of an evaluation of the performance of the CoaguChek XS point-of-care coagulation analyzer, which is discussed in the research article “POCT PT INR – Is it adequate for Patient Care? A Comparison of the Roche Coaguchek XS vs. Stago Star vs. Siemens BCS in Patients Routinely Seen in an Anticoagulation Clinic” (Baker et al., in press) . An effort to reconcile discrepancies in the patient INR result distributions from different central lab instruments (Stago Star and Siemens BCS) with the PT/INR line method is described (Poller et al., 2010, 2011; Ibrahim et al., 2011) . While regression analysis of the ECAA Poller calibrant data provided a linear PT/INR line for all methods, Pearson's chi-squared and one-way repeated measures ANOVA analyses showed that central lab INR measurements continued to exhibit measurement site dependence after the PT/INR line correction was applied. According to paired t-test analysis, only the human thromboplastin dependent methods (CoaguChek XS and Siemens BCS both before and after PT/INR line correction) showed statistically significant agreement ( p -value >0.05).
机译:这里提出的数据是评估Coaguchek XS的关注点凝固分析仪的评价的一部分,这些分析分析仪在研究制品“POCT PT INR - 是患者护理即使是足够的患者护理?在抗凝诊所经常见到的患者中Roche Coaguchek XS与西门子BCS的比较“(Baker等人,在压力机中)。描述了使用PT / INR线路方法从不同中央实验室仪器(STAGO Star和Siemens BCS)的患者INR结果分布差异调和的努力(Puper等,2010,12011; Ibrahim等,2011)。虽然ECAA投掷器校准数据的回归分析为所有方法提供了线性PT / INR线,但Pearson的Chi Squared和单向重复措施Anova分析表明,中央实验室INR测量继续在PT / INR线之后表现出测量站点依赖性纠正应用。根据配对的T检验分析,只有人血栓形成依赖性方法(Pt / InR线校正之前和西门子BC,Pt / InR线校正之前和Siemens BC)显示出统计学意义(p-value> 0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号