首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Data in Brief >Data documenting the performance of the PT/INR line correction method for reconciling INR discrepancies between central laboratory coagulation analyzers using different thromboplastins during the evaluation of a portable Coagulometer
【2h】

Data documenting the performance of the PT/INR line correction method for reconciling INR discrepancies between central laboratory coagulation analyzers using different thromboplastins during the evaluation of a portable Coagulometer

机译:数据记录了在便携式凝血仪评估过程中使用不同的凝血活酶来调和中心实验室凝血分析仪之间INR差异的PT / INR线校正方法的性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The data presented here was produced as part of an evaluation of the performance of the CoaguChek XS point-of-care coagulation analyzer, which is discussed in the research article “POCT PT INR – Is it adequate for Patient Care? A Comparison of the Roche Coaguchek XS vs. Stago Star vs. Siemens BCS in Patients Routinely Seen in an Anticoagulation Clinic” (Baker et al., in press) . An effort to reconcile discrepancies in the patient INR result distributions from different central lab instruments (Stago Star and Siemens BCS) with the PT/INR line method is described (Poller et al., 2010, 2011; Ibrahim et al., 2011) , , . While regression analysis of the ECAA Poller calibrant data provided a linear PT/INR line for all methods, Pearson's chi-squared and one-way repeated measures ANOVA analyses showed that central lab INR measurements continued to exhibit measurement site dependence after the PT/INR line correction was applied. According to paired t-test analysis, only the human thromboplastin dependent methods (CoaguChek XS and Siemens BCS both before and after PT/INR line correction) showed statistically significant agreement (p-value >0.05).
机译:此处提供的数据是对CoaguChek XS即时凝结分析仪性能进行评估的一部分,在研究文章“ POCT PT INR –是否足够进行患者护理?”中进行了讨论。罗氏Coaguchek XS与Stago Star与Siemens BCS在常规抗凝门诊患者中的比较”(Baker等,印刷中)。描述了使用PT / INR线方法来调和来自不同中央实验室仪器(Stago Star和Siemens BCS)的患者INR结果分布差异的工作(Poller等,2010,2011; Ibrahim等,2011), ,。尽管对ECAA Poller校准物数据的回归分析为所有方法提供了线性PT / INR线,但Pearson的卡方和单向重复测量ANOVA分析显示,中心实验室INR测量在PT / INR线之后继续表现出测量位点依赖性进行了更正。根据配对t检验分析,只有人凝血活酶依赖性方法(在PT / INR线校正前后,CoaguChek XS和Siemens BCS都显示出统计学上的显着一致性(p值> 0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号