首页> 外文期刊>Health Science Reports >Sex‐specific analysis of renal cell carcinoma histology and survival in Japan: A population‐based study 2004 to 2016
【24h】

Sex‐specific analysis of renal cell carcinoma histology and survival in Japan: A population‐based study 2004 to 2016

机译:肾细胞癌组织学和日本生存的性别特异性分析:2004年至2016年人口研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and aims In Western countries, sex differences in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histology and survival have been previously described: compared with men, clear cell subtype is more common but overall prognosis is better among women. The goal of the present study was to examine sex differences in RCC histology and survival in Japan, using a large‐scale population‐based data set. Methods With the use of a population‐based cancer registry in Japan (2004‐2016), patients with primary RCC were followed for 5 years (median follow‐up time 2.1 years). We distinguished histological subtypes of clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe from “others” subtype. Sex‐specific prevalence ratio (PR) for each histological subtype was estimated by Poisson regression with robust variance, adjusted for age and year of diagnosis. Sex‐specific survival rates were estimated by Cox proportional hazard regression, adjusted for age, year of diagnosis, histological subtypes, and other prognostic variables, with multiple imputation. Results The prevalence of clear cell and “others” subtypes was similar between men and women among all the 5265 study subjects during the 12 years of study (clear cell, male 88.6% vs female 87.1%; “others“, male 5.3% vs female 5.3%). However, papillary subtype was less common among women than men (male 4.6% vs female 2.8%; PR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45‐0.88), while chromophobe subtype was more common among women (male 1.6% vs female 4.8%; PR = 3.18; 95% CI, 2.26‐4.47). Although “others” subtype (but not papillary/chromophobe subtypes) independently predicted prognosis (HR = 1.74; 95% CI, 1.32‐2.30), no sex differences were observed in RCC survival. Conclusion We did not observe a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of clear cell subtype between men and women in Japan, which differs from the pattern previously described in Western countries. Sex differences in RCC histology may not affect RCC survival in this population.
机译:背景和西方国家的目标,肾细胞癌(RCC)组织学和存活中的性别差异已先描述:与男性相比,透明细胞亚型更常见,但在女性中总体预后更好。本研究的目标是使用大规模的基于人口的数据集来研究日本RCC组织学和生存的性差异。方法随着日本(2004-2016)在日本(2004 - 2016年)使用基于人口的癌症登记,初级RCC患者持续5年(2.1岁的中位随访时间)。我们从“其他”亚型中介绍了透明细胞,乳头状和颤致的组织学亚型。每种组织学亚型的性别特异性患病率(PR)由泊松回归估算具有强大的差异,调整为年龄和诊断年龄。 Cox比例危害回归估算性别特异性生存率,调整为年龄,诊断年龄,组织学亚型和其他预后变量,具有多重归属。结果透明细胞和“其他”亚型的患病率在12年的研究中的5265名研究受试者中相似(透明细胞,男性88.6%VS女87.1%;“其他”,男性5.3%VS女性5.3%)。然而,乳头状亚型在女性中不太常见(男性4.6%VS女性2.8%; PR = 0.63; 95%CI,0.45-0.88),而发色体亚型在女性中更常见(男性1.6%VS女性4.8%; Pr = 3.18; 95%CI,2.26-4.47)。虽然“其他”亚型(但不是乳头状/辐射亚型)独立地预测预后(HR = 1.74; 95%CI,1.32-2.30),在RCC存活中没有观察到性差异。结论我们没有观察日本男女透明细胞亚型患病率的统计学意义,其不同于西方国家之前描述的模式。 RCC组织学的性差异可能不会影响该人群的RCC生存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号