首页> 外文期刊>Vascular Health and Risk Management >Effectiveness of Clinical, Surgical and Percutaneous Treatment to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in Patients Referred for Elective Coronary Angiography: An Observational Study
【24h】

Effectiveness of Clinical, Surgical and Percutaneous Treatment to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in Patients Referred for Elective Coronary Angiography: An Observational Study

机译:临床,外科手术和经皮治疗预防患者心血管事件的有效性:观察冠状动脉造影的患者:观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To ascertain the most appropriate treatment for chronic, stable, coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients submitted to elective coronary angiography. Patients and Methods: A total of 814 patients included in the prospective cohort study were referred for elective coronary angiography and were followed up on average for 6± 1.9 years. Main outcomes were all-cause death, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke and late revascularization and their combinations as major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE): MACCE-1 included cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke; MACCE-2 was MACCE-1 plus late revascularization. Survival curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the association between the type of treatment and outcomes. Results: All-cause death was lower in participants submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (0.41, 0.16– 1.03, P=0.057) compared to medical treatment (MT). Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) had an overall trend for poorer outcomes: cardiovascular death 2.53 (0.42– 15.10), combined cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke 2.15 (0.73– 6.31) and these events plus late revascularization (2.17, 0.86– 5.49). The corresponding numbers for PCI were 0.27 (0.05– 1.43) for cardiovascular death, 0.77 (0.32– 1.84) for combined cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke and 2.35 (1.16– 4.77) with the addition of late revascularization. These trends were not influenced by baseline blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction and previous MI. Patients with diabetes mellitus had a significantly higher risk of recurrent revascularization when submitted to PCI than CABG. Conclusion: Patients with confirmed CAD in elective coronary angiography do not have a better prognosis when submitted to CABG comparatively to medical treatment. Patients treated with PCI had a trend for the lower incidence of combined cardiovascular events, at the expense of additional revascularization procedures. Patients without significant CAD had a similar prognosis than CAD patients treated with medical therapy.
机译:目的:确定提交选修冠状动脉造影的患者慢性,稳定,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)最合适的治疗。患者和方法:提交了614名患者,前瞻性研究患者参考了选择性冠状动脉造影,平均随访6±1.9岁。主要结果是全导致死亡,心血管死亡,非致命心肌梗死(MI)和中风和晚期血运重建及其组合作为主要不良心脏和脑事件(宏):麦克铁1包括心血管死亡,非缺乏MI和中风; MACCE-2是MACCE-1加晚期血运重建。使用生存曲线和调整的Cox比例危险模型用于探索治疗类型和结果之间的关联。结果:与医疗(MT)相比,提交给经皮冠状动脉干预(PCI)的参与者(PCI)(PCI)(0.41,0.16-1.03,p = 0.057),均导致死亡较低。冠状动脉旁路接枝(CABG)具有较差的结果的整体趋势:心血管死亡2.53(0.42-15.10),组合心血管死亡,非缺乏MI和中风2.15(0.73-6.31)和这些事件加早期血运重建(2.17,0.86 - 5.49)。用于心血管死亡的PCI的相应数字为0.27(0.05-1.43),用于组合心血管死亡,非常规MI和中风和2.35(1.16-4.77),加入晚期血运重建,0.77(0.32- 1.84)。这些趋势不受基线血压,左心室喷射部分和以前的MI的影响。糖尿病患者在提交PCI时具有明显更高的复发性血运重建风险而不是CABG。结论:在与医疗相比,选择性冠状动脉造影中的确诊CAD患者在提交给CABG时,没有更好的预后。用PCI治疗的患者患有额外的心血管事件发生率较低,以额外的血运重建程序为代价。没有显着CAD的患者具有比医疗治疗治疗的CAD患者的预后类似的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号