首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Salvage treatment of NSCLC recurrence after first‐line chemotherapy failure: Iodine‐125 seed brachytherapy or microwave ablation?
【24h】

Salvage treatment of NSCLC recurrence after first‐line chemotherapy failure: Iodine‐125 seed brachytherapy or microwave ablation?

机译:第一线化疗衰竭后NSCLC复发的救装治疗:碘-125种子近距离放射治疗或微波消融?

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Salvage treatments for recurrent NSCLC after first-line chemotherapy remain challenging. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical value of microwave ablation (MWA) and iodine-125 brachytherapy, including overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), local control, hospital stay, and health economics.METHODS:The data of 51 and 32 patients who were treated with MWA and brachytherapy was retrospectively analyzed. The number of lesions was limited up to two, with a diameter?4 cm and patients diagnosed with unilateral lung disease. Peripheral tumors were treated with MWA, while lesions close to the hilum were treated with brachytherapy. Contrast-enhanced CT, blood cell count, coagulation function, liver & kidney function and tumor markers were performed for two?years, with complications calculated. OS, DFS, local control rate, toxicity, hospital stay and expense were recorded.RESULTS:The one and two-year OS rates were 96.08% and 92.16% versus 96.88% and 90.62% in the MWA and brachytherapy groups, respectively. The one and two-year DFS rates were 92.16% and 76.47% versus 93.75% and 78.13%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in log-rank analysis between the groups. Local control rates at six and 12?months were 100% and 96.08% versus 100% and 96.88%, while incidences of pleural effusion were 3.92% and 3.13%, respectively (P??0.05). Medical cost was 3356.73?±?206.87 and 6714.28?±?35.43 U.S. dollars (P = 0.014).CONCLUSION:MWA and brachytherapy are effective and safe options for the treatment of NSCLC recurrence after first-line chemotherapy. Which modality should be considered is dependent upon tumor location, tumor size and experience of specialists.? 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
机译:背景:一线化疗后复发性NSCLC的挽救治疗仍然具有挑战性。进行该研究以评估微波消融(MWA)和碘-125近距离放射治疗的临床价值,包括整体存活(OS),无病生存(DFS),局部控制,住院住宿和健康经济学。方法:数据回顾性分析了用MWA和近距离放射治疗治疗的51和32例患者。病变的数量受到限制,直径为Δ<4厘米,患者诊断出单侧肺病。用MWA处理外周肿瘤,而近距离放射治疗治疗近肝脏的病变。对比增强的CT,血细胞计数,凝血功能,肝肾功能和肿瘤标志物进行两年,计算并发症。录制了OS,DF,局部控制率,毒性,住院住宿和费用。结果:分别为96.08%,分别为96.08%和92.16%,分别为MWA和近距离放疗群体的96.88%和90.62%。一年和两年的DFS率分别为92.16%和76.47%,分别为93.75%和78.13%。在组之间的对数级分析中没有观察到显着差异。六个月和12个月的局部控制率为100%和96.08%,而胸腔积液的发生率分别为3.92%和3.13%(P?<0.05)。医疗费用为3356.73?±206.87和6714.28?±35.43 U.S美元(P = 0.014)。结论:MWA和Brachy治疗是在一线化疗后治疗NSCLC复发的有效和安全的选择。应该考虑哪种模态取决于肿瘤位置,肿瘤大小和专家的经验。 2020作者。中国肺部肿瘤集团和约翰瓦里和儿子澳大利亚发表的胸癌

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号