首页> 外文期刊>Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery >Robust principal component analysis in optical micro-angiography
【24h】

Robust principal component analysis in optical micro-angiography

机译:光学微血管造影的鲁棒主成分分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Recent development of optical micro-angiography (OMAG) utilizes principal component analysis (PCA), where linear-regression filter is employed to separate static and blood flow signals within optical coherence tomography (OCT). While PCA is relatively simple and computationally efficient, the technique is sensitive to and easily skewed by outliers. In this paper, robust PCA (RPCA) is thus introduced to tackle this issue in traditional PCA. Methods: We first provide brief theoretical background of PCA and RPCA in the context of OMAG where coherent (complex) OCT signals are utilized to contrast blood flow. We then compare PCA and RPCA on sets of 4D-OCT complex data (3 dimensions in space and 1 dimension in time), which are collected from microfluidic phantoms and in vivo nail-fold tissue. Results: In phantom experiments, both analyses perform relatively well since there are little motion within our observation time window, albeit small tail-noise artifacts from PCA. In nail-fold experiment, PCA suffers from tissue motion, from which RPCA does not seem to be affected. Results from RPCA also show enhancements of other dynamic signals, which are likely from the intercellular fluid. This unwanted result is yet to be proven useful for clinical applications. Conclusions: Traditional PCA method employs linear-regression filter and is sensitive to outliers (tail-noise and motion artifacts). RPCA method is robust against outliers, but is currently computationally expensive.
机译:背景:光学微血管造影(OMAG)的最新发展利用主成分分析(PCA),其中采用线性回归滤波器在光学相干断层扫描(OCT)内分离静态和血流信号。虽然PCA相对简单且计算高效,但该技术对异常值敏感并且容易倾斜。在本文中,因此引入了强大的PCA(RPCA)来解决传统PCA中的这个问题。方法:首先在OMAG的背景下首先提供PCA和RPCA的简要理论背景,其中相干(复杂)OCT信号用于对比血液流动。然后,我们将PCA和RPCA比较4D-OCT复杂数据(空间3个尺寸和1尺寸的3个尺寸),从微流体幻像和体内钉组织中收集。结果:在幻影实验中,两者分析都表现得相对较好,因为我们的观察时间窗口很少,尽管来自PCA的小尾噪声伪像。在指甲折叠实验中,PCA患有组织运动,从中似乎没有受到影响。 RPCA的结果还显示出可能来自细胞间流体的其他动态信号的增强。这种不需要的结果尚未证明对临床应用有用。结论:传统的PCA方法采用线性回归过滤器,对异常值敏感(尾噪声和运动伪影)。 RPCA方法对异常值具有强大,但目前是计算昂贵的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号