首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Medicine >Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: Lessons to date and the future of taxation
【24h】

Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: Lessons to date and the future of taxation

机译:糖甜味的饮料税:迄今为止和税收未来的经验教训

获取原文
       

摘要

We see at least 2 major health-related reasons to focus on SSBs. First, excess sugar consumption is a major cause of obesity and the increasing risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, liverand kidney damage, heart disease, and some cancers [2–4]. Second, high-caloric beveragesoffer little caloric compensation, so reducing their consumption lowers obesity risk [5,6]. Furthermore, we are beginning to understand the potential impacts of these beverages on stuntingas well as obesity [7–11]. A less emphasized reason that deserves greater attention as we consider the links between our diets and planetary health is the environmental costs related to theproduction of sugary drinks, particularly in water use and carbon emissions. Estimates of totalwater lifecycle costs to produce a half-liter (or 17-ounce) regular soft drink range from 168 to309 liters, depending on the sugar source and farm technology [12–14]. Finally, from a practical standpoint, SSB taxes have gained momentum because of their relative ease of implementation compared to other food/nutrition policy options. Taxes collected from manufacturers,bottlers, and distributors can often be built into existing taxation frameworks and collectionsystems, and these health taxes are a potential source of revenue.
机译:我们认为至少有2个主要的健康状况,专注于SSB。首先,过量的糖消耗是肥胖的主要原因,2型糖尿病,高血压,肝肾损伤,心脏病和一些癌症的风险增加[2-4]。二,高热量饮料较少的热量补偿,因此降低消费量降低了肥胖风险[5,6]。此外,我们开始了解这些饮料对令人生畏的潜在影响[7-11]。一种不太强调的原因,当我们考虑我们的饮食和行星健康之间的联系是与含水饮料的生产有关的环境成本,特别是在用水和碳排放中。根据糖源和农场技术,从168〜309升生产半升(或17盎司)常规软饮料范围的估计,从168〜309升生产半升(或17盎司)。最后,从实际的角度来看,由于与其他食品/营养政策选择相比,SSB税收了势头。从制造商,瓶客和经销商中收集的税收通常可以建立在现有的税务框架和收集系统中,这些卫生税是潜在的收入来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号