首页> 外文期刊>Physical Review Physics Education Research >Response switching and self-efficacy in Peer Instruction classrooms
【24h】

Response switching and self-efficacy in Peer Instruction classrooms

机译:对等教学教室中的响应切换和自我效能

获取原文
       

摘要

Peer Instruction, a well-known student-centered teaching method, engages students during class through structured, frequent questioning and is often facilitated by classroom response systems. The central feature of any Peer Instruction class is a conceptual question designed to help resolve student misconceptions about subject matter. We provide students two opportunities to answer each questiona€”once after a round of individual reflection and then again after a discussion round with a peer. The second round provides students the choice to a€?switcha€? their original response to a different answer. The percentage of right answers typically increases after peer discussion: most students who answer incorrectly in the individual round switch to the correct answer after the peer discussion. However, for any given question there are also students who switch their initially right answer to a wrong answer and students who switch their initially wrong answer to a different wrong answer. In this study, we analyze response switching over one semester of an introductory electricity and magnetism course taught using Peer Instruction at Harvard University. Two key features emerge from our analysis: First, response switching correlates with academic self-efficacy. Students with low self-efficacy switch their responses more than students with high self-efficacy. Second, switching also correlates with the difficulty of the question; students switch to incorrect responses more often when the question is difficult. These findings indicate that instructors may need to provide greater support for difficult questions, such as supplying cues during lectures, increasing times for discussions, or ensuring effective pairing (such as having a student with one right answer in the pair). Additionally, the connection between response switching and self-efficacy motivates interventions to increase student self-efficacy at the beginning of the semester by helping students develop early mastery or to reduce stressful experiences (i.e., high-stakes testing) early in the semester, in the hope that this will improve student learning in Peer Instruction classrooms.
机译:同行指导,一位着名的学生为中心的教学方法,通过结构化,频繁地提问,常见的询问和经常被课堂响应系统促进。任何对等指令类的中央功能是一个概念性问题,旨在帮助解决对主题的学生误解。我们为学生提供两个机会来回答每个召唤€“一次在一轮单独的反思之后,然后再次与同伴讨论后再次。第二轮为学生提供了一个欧元的选择吗?他们对不同答案的原始回应。正确答案的百分比通常会在同行讨论后增加:大多数学生在个人圆形切换后不正确回答在同行讨论后的正确答案。但是,对于任何给定的问题,还有学生将最初正确答案转换为错误的答案和转换他们最初错误答案的学生对不同的错误答案。在这项研究中,我们分析了在哈佛大学使用同伴教学所教导的介绍电力和磁力课程的一个学期的响应转换。我们的分析中出现了两个关键功能:首先,响应切换与学术自我效能相关。自我效能低的学生将其响应超过具有高自我效力的学生。其次,切换也与问题的难度相关联;当问题很困难时,学生更频繁地切换到不正确的响应。这些调查结果表明,教师可能需要为难题提供更大的支持,例如在讲座期间提供线索,越来越多的讨论时间,或确保有效配对(例如,在这对中有一个正确答案的学生)。此外,响应转换和自我效能之间的联系激励干预措施通过帮助学生提前掌握或减少学期早期(即高赌注测试)的学生开始,增加学期的学生自我效能希望这将改善同伴教学教室中的学生学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号