首页> 外文期刊>Pediatrics Neonatology >Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus intubation for surfactant administration in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome
【24h】

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus intubation for surfactant administration in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome

机译:极微创表面活性剂治疗与呼吸窘迫综合征非常低出生体重婴儿的表面活性剂给药

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is a new mode of surfactant administration without intubation to spontaneously breathing preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of using MIST to give surfactant for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with RDS. Methods In total, 53 VLBW infants who were born before 32 gestational weeks with spontaneous breathing, respiratory distress, and requiring surfactant therapy were divided into two groups. The infants in group A (n?=?29) were intubated and received surfactant replacement therapy via endotracheal tube, followed by mechanical ventilation (MV). The infants in group B (n?=?24) received tracheal instillation of surfactant via a semirigid vascular catheter during spontaneous breathing under nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). After surfactant instillation, the infants in group B were still placed on nCPAP. Results Our data showed that infants in group B (MIST group) had significantly lower rate (P??0.05) of composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), duration of intermittent positive airway pressure ventilation (IPPV) or MV, drug treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), and surgical ligation of PDA than group A. Conclusion MIST is feasible, safe and it may reduce the composite outcome of death or BPD for VLBW infants with RDS requiring surfactant replacement therapy.
机译:背景技术微创表面活性剂疗法(雾)是一种新的表面活性剂施用模式,而不会插管,以自发地呼吸早产儿,呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)。本研究的目的是评估使用雾的可行性,疗效和安全性,使表面活性剂为非常低的出生体重(VLBW)婴儿RDS。在32个妊娠周之前出生的总共53名VLBW婴儿,随着自发的呼吸,呼吸窘迫和需要表面活性剂治疗,分为两组。将A(n?=β29)组中的婴儿通过气管导管吸食并接受表面活性剂替代疗法,然后通过机械通气(MV)。 B组(N?=Δ24)中的婴儿通过在鼻连续正气道压力(NCPAP)下的自发呼吸期间通过半血管血管导管接受了表面活性剂的气管灌注。在表面活性剂滴注后,B组婴儿仍然放在NCPAP上。结果我们的数据显示,B组(雾群)婴幼儿(雾群)的患者率明显降低(P?<0.05)死亡或支气管扩张发育不良(BPD),间歇性正气道压力通风(IPPV)或MV,药物的持续时间PDA的PDA专利导管(PDA)的治疗和PDA的手术结扎。结论雾是可行的,安全性,并且可能会降低VLBW婴儿的死亡或BPD的复合结果,需要RDS需要表面活性剂替代疗法的RDS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号