首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >HIP ARTHROSCOPY VS. PHYSICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
【24h】

HIP ARTHROSCOPY VS. PHYSICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

机译:髋关节镜检查与股股抗撞患者的物理治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: Both physical therapy (PT) and surgery appear to have some efficacy in treating femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Only recently have high-level evidence studies compared these two options, though results of these randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are contradictory. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing PT and surgery in patients with FAI. Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify randomized trials comparing FAI and PT. Data was extracted for demographics, study design, patient reported outcomes (PROs), and study quality/bias. In total, 819 abstracts were reviewed, with three RCTs identified (Griffin 2018, Mansell 2018, and Palmer 2019). All three RCTs reported iHOT-33, while two studies reported HOS ADL and Sport (Mansell 2019 and Palmer 2019). In a random effects meta-analysis, between-group differences in post-intervention scores were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis in each study. Results: All 3 RCTs reported PROs improvement from baseline to follow-up for both PT and surgery. The meta-analysis demonstrated greater improved iHOT-33 outcomes with surgery compared to PT with a mean relative difference of 11.3 (95% CI 1.86-20.73, p=0.014). The meta-analysis for HOS ADL and Sports (two RCTs) similarly demonstrated higher scores with surgery with a mean difference of 3.9 (95% CI -9.6-17.3, p=0.571) and 6.2 (95% CI -6.8-19.2, p=0.347), respectively, though without statistical significance. The quality of two RCTs was assessed as good with minimal bias (Griffin and Palmer). In the third RCT, an extremely high crossover rate may affect its validity (Mansell 2018, 70% crossover from PT to surgery). For instance, HOS ADL outcome based on treatment received, adjusting for Mansell’s crossover rate, favored surgery with a larger mean difference of 12.0 (95% CI 7.5-16.5, p&0.001) (compared to intention-to-treat difference of 3.9). Discussion: In patients with FAI, combined results of three RCTs demonstrate superior outcomes of surgery compared to PT. However, PT can result in improvements in some patients and does not appear to compromise surgical outcomes. Provided that the studies adjusted for certain patient characteristics, further research needs to identify patient characteristics that predict success of non-operative and operative treatment of FAI in specific patient subgroups. Figure 1. Mean Difference in iHOT-33 between Surgery and Physiotherapy
机译:简介:物理治疗(PT)和手术似乎在治疗股股撞击(FAI)方面具有一些功效。只有最近有高级别的证据研究比较这两种选择,但这些随机对照试验(RCT)的结果是矛盾的。本研究的目的是对CTS和FAI患者的PT和手术进行RCT进行系统评价和荟萃分析。方法:进行系统审查以确定比较FAI和PT的随机试验。提取数据以用于人口统计数据,研究设计,患者报告的结果(专业人员),以及研究质量/偏见。总共有819个摘要,其中包含了三个RCT(Griffin 2018,Mansell 2018和Palmer 2019)。所有三个RCT都报告了IHOT-33,而两项研究报告过HOS ADL和Sport(Mansell 2019和2019年帕尔默)。在随机效应中,使用每项研究中的有意治疗分析评估在干预后分数的组间差异。结果:所有3个RCT都报告从基线改善PT和手术的后续行动。与PT相比,Meta分析表明,与PT的平均相对差异为11.3(95%CI 1.86-20.73,P = 0.014),更加改善了手术。 HOS ADL和运动(两个RCT)的META分析类似地表现出较高的手术,具有平均差异为3.9(95%CI -9.6-17.3,P = 0.571)和6.2(95%CI -6.8-19.2,P = 0.347)分别,但没有统计显着性。两个RCT的质量被评估为良好的偏差(Griffin和Palmer)。在第三个RCT中,极高的交叉速率可能会影响其有效性(Mansell 2018,从PT到手术的70%交叉)。例如,基于接受治疗的HOS ADL结果,调整Mansell的交叉率,有利于手术,较大平均差异为12.0(95%CI 7.5-16.5,P <0.001)(与3.9的意图差异相比) 。讨论:在FAI患者中,与PT相比,三个RCT的组合结果表明了手术的优越结果。然而,PT可以导致一些患者的改善,并且似乎并未损害外科结果。如果对某些患者特征进行调整的研究,进一步的研究需要鉴定预测特定患者亚组非手术和手术治疗的患者特征。图1.手术与物理疗法之间的IHOT-33平均差异

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号