首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Journal >Food selection criteria for disaster response planning in urban societies
【24h】

Food selection criteria for disaster response planning in urban societies

机译:城市社会灾害响应规划的食品选择标准

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Nutrition professionals that have menu planning and disaster management responsibilities should consider factors that have transcended from ancient to current times, in addition to recognizing societal trends that have led to our current increased vulnerability in the event of a disaster. Hence, we proceeded to develop a set of “Disaster Response Diets” (DRDs) for use in urban societies inclusive of the aforementioned considerations. Methods A three-phase multidimensional approach was used to identify food groups suitable for creating a set of DRDs. Phase One consisted of calculating the percent daily nutrient intake and Drewnowski’s naturally nutrient rich (NNR) score for an individual or mean composite for one serving of food from 11 specific food groups. In Phase Two, in addition to nutrient density, the 11 food groups were evaluated and scored based on the following DRD planning criteria: storage and handling properties, preparation ease and, cultural acceptance/individual tolerance. During Phase Three, three DRDs were developed based upon the data retrieved from Phases one and two. Results In Phase One, the NNR scores ranged from 2.1 for fresh fruits to 28.1 for dry cereals, a higher score indicating a higher nutrient density. During Phase Two, a maximum score of 12 was possible based on appropriateness for a disaster situation. Five plant-based food groups (dry cereals, nuts, dried fruits, grains and legumes) achieved a score ranging between 7 and 12, whereas the five fresh food groups were deemed ineligible due to sanitation and perishability concerns. During Phase Three, three DRDs (milk-inclusive, milk-free and Grab-and-Go) were developed as benchmarks for disaster response planning. Conclusions Plant-based DRDs are universally acceptable and tolerated across cultures and religions. Therefore, we suggest nutrition professionals consider using a plant-based approach for creating DRDs for public health institutions and organizations.
机译:背景技术除了承认导致我们当前在发生灾难时导致我们目前的脆弱性的社会趋势外,还要考虑将从古代到当前时间超越古代的因素。因此,我们继续开发一套“灾难反应饮食”(DRDS),供城市社会包括上述考虑因素。方法采用三相多维方法来识别适合创建一组DRD的食物组。第一个由计算每种食物的单个或平均复合材料的每日营养摄入量和Drewnowski的自然营养素(NNR)评分的百分比组成。在第二阶段,除了营养密度外,还基于以下DRD规划标准评估并评估11种食物组:储存和处理性能,准备易于和文化接受/个人耐受性。在第三阶段,基于从阶段检索到的数据,开发了三个DRD。结果一相,NNR分数为2.1,对于干谷物的新鲜水果为28.1,表明营养密度较高。在第二阶段,基于灾难情况的适当性,最大得分为12。五种植物的食物群(干谷物,螺母,干果,谷物和豆类)在7到12之间取得得分,而五群新鲜食品群体因卫生和易腐性问题而被视为不合格。在第三阶段,三个DRD(牛奶包容性,无乳和抢手和去)被开发为灾难响应计划的基准。结论基于工厂的DRD普遍接受和宽容跨文化和宗教。因此,我们建议使用基于工厂的方法来为公共卫生机构和组织制造DRD来考虑营养专业人士。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号