...
首页> 外文期刊>Nagoya journal of medical science >High-flow nasal cannula therapy for acute respiratory failure in patients with interstitial pneumonia: a retrospective observational study
【24h】

High-flow nasal cannula therapy for acute respiratory failure in patients with interstitial pneumonia: a retrospective observational study

机译:高流量鼻腔套管治疗患者患者急性呼吸衰竭:回顾性观测研究

获取原文
           

摘要

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen is a therapy that has demonstrated survival benefits in acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, the role of HFNC in ARF due to interstitial pneumonia (IP) is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of HFNC therapy and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in ARF due to IP. This retrospective observational study included 32 patients with ARF due to IP who were treated with HFNC (n = 13) or NPPV (n = 19). The clinical characteristics, intubation rate and 30-day mortality were analyzed and compared between the HFNC group and the NPPV group. Predictors of 30-day mortality were evaluated using a logistic regression model. HFNC group showed higher mean arterial blood pressure (median 92 mmHg; HFNC group vs 74 mmHg; NPPV group) and lower APACHEII score (median 22; HFNC group vs 27; NPPV group) than NPPV group. There was no significant difference in the intubation rate at day 30 between the HFNC group and the NPPV group (8% vs 37%: p = 0.069); the mortality rate at 30 days was 23% and 63%, respectively. HFNC therapy was a significant determinant of 30-day mortality in univariate analysis, and was confirmed to be an independent significant determinant of 30-day mortality in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.148; 95% confidence interval, 0.025–0.880; p = 0.036). Our findings suggest that HFNC therapy can be a possible option for respiratory management in ARF due to IP. The results observed here warrant further investigation of HFNC therapy in randomized control trials.
机译:高流量鼻腔插管(HFNC)氧是一种治疗,在急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)中表现出存活益处。然而,由于间质肺炎(IP),HFNC在ARF中的作用是未知的。本研究的目的是将HFNC治疗和非侵入性阳性压力通气(NPPV)的影响进行比较,由于IP,ARF在ARF中。该回顾性观察研究包括由HFNC(n = 13)或NPPV(n = 19)处理的IP引起的32例ARF患者。分析临床特征,插管率和30天死亡率,并在HFNC组和NPPV组之间进行比较。使用Logistic回归模型评估30天死亡率的预测因素。 HFNC组均显示出平均动脉血压(中位数92mmHg; HFNC组与74 mmHg; NPPV组)和降低ApacheII得分(中位数22; HFNC组与27; NPPV组)比NPPV组。 HFNC组和NPPV组之间的30天的插管率没有显着差异(8%vs 37%:P = 0.069); 30天的死亡率分别为23%和63%。 HFNC疗法是单变量分析30天死亡率的重要决定因素,并确认是多元分析中30天死亡率的独立重大决定因素(差距比例,0.148; 95%置信区间,0.025-0.880; P = 0.036 )。我们的研究结果表明,由于IP,HFNC治疗可能是ARF中呼吸系统管理的可能选择。此处观察到的结果需要进一步调查随机对照试验中的HFNC治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号