首页> 外文期刊>MDM Policy & Practice >Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis
【24h】

Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis

机译:澳大利亚和中国的文化,自我和医学决策:结构模型分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To explore and compare the influences of individual-level cultural values and personal attitudinal values on the desire for medical information and self-involvement in decision making in Australia and China. Methods. A total of 288 and 291 middle-aged adults from Australia and China, respectively, completed an online survey examining cultural and personal values, and their desired level of self-influence on medical decision making. Structural equation modeling was used to test 15 hypotheses relating to the effects of cultural and personal antecedents on the individual desire for influence over medical decision making. Results. Similar factors in both Australia and China (total variance explained: Australia 29%; China 35%) predicted desire for medical information, with interdependence (unstandardized path coefficient βAustralia = 0.102, P = 0.014; βChina = 0.215, P = 0.001), independence (βAustralia = 0.244, P 0.001; βChina = 0.123, P = 0.037), and health locus of control (βAustralia = ?0.140, P = 0.018; βChina = ?0.138, P = 0.007) being significant and positive predictors. A desire for involvement in decisions was only predicted by power distance, which had an opposite effect of being negative for Australia and positive for China (total variance explained: Australia 11%; China 5%; βAustralia = 0.294, P 0.001; China: βChina = ?0.190, P = 0.043). National culture moderated the effect of independence on desire for medical information, which was stronger in Australia than China (Z score = 1.687, P 0.05). Conclusions. Study results demonstrate that in both countries, desire for medical information can be influenced by individual-level cultural and personal values, suggesting potential benefits of tailoring health communication to personal mindsets to foster informed decision making. The desired level of self-involvement in decision making was relatively independent of other cultural and personal values in both countries, suggesting caution against cultural stereotypes. Study findings also suggest that involvement preferences in decision making should be considered separately from information needs at the clinical encounter.
机译:客观的。探索和比较各级文化价值观的影响和个人态度值对澳大利亚和中国决策决策的渴望。方法。共有288岁和291名中年成年人分别完成了在线调查检查文化和个人价值观,以及他们对医学决策的理想自我影响程度。结构方程建模用于测试与文化和个人前一种对医疗决策影响的个人愿望的影响有关的15个假设。结果。澳大利亚和中国的类似因素(总方差解释:澳大利亚29%;中国35%)预测对医疗信息的欲望,具有相互依存(非标准化的路径系数βaustralia= 0.102,P = 0.014;βChina= 0.215,P = 0.001),独立性(βaustralia= 0.244,p <0.001;βCHINA= 0.123,P = 0.037),以及健康控制轨迹(βaustralia=Δ0.140,p = 0.018;βCHINA= 0.138,P = 0.007)是显着的和阳性预测因子。对决策的渴望仅被权力距离预测,这对澳大利亚负面影响以及中国的阳性有相反的效果(解释的总方差:澳大利亚11%;中国5%;βaustralia= 0.294,P <0.001;中国: βCHINA=?0.190,P = 0.043)。国家文化适度,独立对澳大利亚的渴望的影响,澳大利亚比中国更强大(Z得分= 1.687,P <0.05)。结论。研究结果表明,在这两个国家,医疗信息的欲望可能会受到个人级别的文化和个人价值的影响,这表明对个人心态定制健康沟通的潜在利益,以促进知情的决策。决策的理想水平相对独立于两国的其他文化和个人价值观,表明谨慎对文化陈规定型观念。研究调查结果还表明,决策中的参与偏好应在临床遭遇中与信息需求分开考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号