首页> 外文期刊>European journal of medical research. >Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty
【24h】

Comparison of a flexible versus rigid bone cement injection system in unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty

机译:柔性与刚性骨水泥注射系统在单侧经皮椎体成形术中的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture (AOVF). However, bilateral puncture takes more time to accept more X-ray irradiation; some scholars apply unilateral puncture PVP, but the cement cannot be symmetrically distributed in the vertebral body, so we use a flexible cement injector that undergoes PVP through the unilateral pedicle puncture. This research aims to compare the clinical results of PVP for AOVF with unilateral pedicle puncture using a straight bone cement injector and a bendable cement injector, determine the value of a bendable cement injector. We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with thoracic and lumbar compression fracture treated with unilateral pedicle puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty from our institution from June 2013 to July 2015. Operation time, radiation exposure, bone cement injection amount, and the incidence of bone cement leakage were recorded on presentation, the cement leakage was measured by X-ray and computed tomography scan. The patients were followed up postoperatively and were assessed mainly with regard to clinical and radiological outcomes. There was no significant difference in the operation time, radiation exposure time and incidence of bone cement leakage between the two groups. There was significant difference in the amount of bone cement injection and the difference between the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and the relative height of the vertebral body and local Cobb angle and QUALEFFO between the two groups at 1?week after PVP, significant difference was observed only 12?months after operation. Application of flexible cement injector is safe and feasible, compared with the application of straight bone cement injector, without prolonging the operative time, radiation exposure time and the incidence of bone cement leakage; it has the advantages of good long-term effect and low incidence of vertebral fracture recurrence.
机译:已经证明了经皮椎体成形术(PVP)在治疗急性骨质疏松椎体骨折(AOVF)中是有效的。然而,双侧穿刺需要更多的时间来接受更多的X射线照射;有些学者应用单侧穿刺PVP,但水泥不能对称分布在椎体中,因此我们使用柔性水泥注射器,通过单侧椎弓根穿刺进行PVP。本研究旨在使用直骨水泥注射器和可弯曲水泥注射器的单侧椎弓根穿刺来比较PVP对AOVF的临床结果,确定可弯曲水泥注射器的值。我们对从2013年6月至2015年7月到7月的单侧椎弓根刺穿经皮椎体术治疗的胸椎和腰椎压缩骨折的患者进行了回顾性分析。操作时间,辐射暴露,骨水泥注射量和骨水泥泄漏的发生率在介绍时,通过X射线和计算机断层扫描测量水泥泄漏。术后患者随访,主要在临床和放射性结果方面进行评估。两组之间的操作时间,辐射暴露时间和骨水泥泄漏发生率没有显着差异。骨水泥注射量的差异有显着差异以及两组之间的差异。 VAS和椎体的相对高度没有显着差异,椎体和局部COBB角度和两组之间的QUALEFFO在PVP后的一周内,术后只观察到显着差异。柔性水泥注射器的应用是安全可行的,与直骨水泥注射器的应用相比,无需延长手术时间,辐射暴露时间和骨水泥泄漏的发生率;它具有良好的长期效果和椎体骨折复发率低的优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号