...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Dentistry >Clinical Effects of Mercury in Conservative Dentistry: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Clinical Effects of Mercury in Conservative Dentistry: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:保守牙科汞的临床影响:随机对照试验的系统评价,荟萃分析和试验顺序分析

获取原文

摘要

Background and Purpose. Following the new directives of the European Union, which foresee the amalgam ban, the debate on its hypothetical toxicity has started again. So, the aim of this systematic review is to definitively evaluate the eventual effects of the exposure to Hg in adults and children with and without dental amalgam fillings measuring the Hg concentration in various biological fluids. Methods. A systematic literature search was conducted in four electronic databases (Ovid via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL) including all available randomised controlled trials published in the last 15 years comparing the use of dental amalgam with composite resins in humans with a follow-up period of at least one year. The primary outcome was the Hg concentration in biological fluids (urine, hair, blood, and saliva) with the aim of assessing their reliability as biomarkers of Hg exposure. The risk of bias was assessed through the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the overall quality of evidence through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed using a random-effects model, and their power was assessed through the trial sequential analysis (TSA). Results. From the initial 2555 results, only 6 publications were included in the review: five were considered as having high risk of bias, whereas one as having moderate risk. Only two articles were eligible for quantitative analysis. The meta-analysis gathered data from 859 patients but was nevertheless not significant (p?=?0.12). The TSA confirmed this evidence revealing that it was due to a lack of statistical power since the required information size (RIS) threshold is not reached. Conclusions. The existing evidence revealed that there are not enough data to support the hypothesis that restorations with dental amalgam can cause nephrotoxicity when compared with composite resins restorations.
机译:背景和目的。遵循欧洲联盟的新指令,其中预见了阿马尔加禁令,就其假设毒性的辩论再次开始。因此,这种系统审查的目的是明确地评估在成人和儿童中暴露于HG的最终影响,其中没有牙科汞合金填充,测量各种生物流体中的HG浓度。方法。系统文献搜索是在四个电子数据库(Ovid通过PubMed,Scoupus和Central)的ovid,包括在过去15年中发表的所有可随机对照试验,比较了使用牙科汞合金与人类的复合树脂的使用-Up至少一年。主要结果是生物流体(尿液,毛,血液和唾液)中的Hg浓度,目的是评估其可靠性作为Hg暴露的生物标志物。通过Cochrane协作工具和通过分级建议,评估,开发和评估(等级)系统进行评估偏见的风险。使用随机效应模型表达META分析的结果,通过试验顺序分析(TSA)来评估它们的功率。结果。从最初的2555个结果中,审查中只有6个出版物,其中五个出版物:五被认为具有高偏见风险,而一种具有适度风险的风险。只有两个文章有资格进行定量分析。元分析收集了859名患者的数据,但仍未有显着(p?= 0.12)。 TSA证实了这一证据表明,由于未达到所需信息规模(RIS)阈值,因此由于缺乏统计功率。结论。现有证据表明,没有足够的数据来支持与牙科汞合金的修复后的假设会导致肾毒性与复合树脂修复体相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号