首页> 外文期刊>Education Sciences >Active Learning: Subtypes, Intra-Exam Comparison, and Student Survey in an Undergraduate Biology Course
【24h】

Active Learning: Subtypes, Intra-Exam Comparison, and Student Survey in an Undergraduate Biology Course

机译:主动学习:亚型,考试的比较和学生调查在本科生物学课程中

获取原文
       

摘要

Active learning improves undergraduate STEM course comprehension; however, student comprehension using different active learning methods and student perception of active learning have not been fully explored. We analyze ten semesters (six years) of an undergraduate biology course (honors and non-honors sections) to understand student comprehension and student satisfaction using a variety of active learning methods. First, we describe and introduce active learning subtypes. Second, we explore the efficacy of active learning subtypes. Third, we compare student comprehension between course material taught with active learning or lecturing within a course. Finally, we determine student satisfaction with active learning using a survey. We divide active learning into five subtypes based on established learning taxonomies and student engagement. We explore subtype comprehension efficacy (median % correct) compared to lecture learning (median 92% correct): Recognition (100%), Reflective (100%), Exchanging (94.1%), Constructive (93.8%), and Analytical (93.3%). A bivariate random intercept model adjusted by honors shows improved exam performance in subsequent exams and better course material comprehension when taught using active learning compared to lecture learning (2.2% versus 1.2%). The student survey reveals a positive trend over six years of teaching in the Perceived Individual Utility component of active learning ( tau = 0.21, p = 0.014), but not for the other components (General Theoretical Utility, and Team Situation). We apply our findings to the COVID-19 pandemic and suggest active learning adaptations for newly modified online courses. Overall, our results suggest active learning subtypes may be useful for differentiating student comprehension, provide additional evidence that active learning is more beneficial to student comprehension, and show that student perceptions of active learning are positively changing.
机译:积极学习改善本科干期课程理解;然而,使用不同的积极学习方法和学生对主动学习的感知的学生理解尚未得到充分探索。我们分析了本科生物课程(荣誉和非荣誉部分)的十个学期(六年),以了解使用各种积极学习方法的学生理解和学生满意度。首先,我们描述并引入主动学习亚型。其次,我们探索了主动学习亚型的功效。第三,我们比较在课程内主动学习或讲课的课程材料之间的学生理解。最后,我们使用调查确定了主动学习的学生满意度。基于建立的学习分类和学生参与,我们将主动学习分为五个亚型。我们探索亚型理解疗效(中位数%正确)与讲座学习(中位数92%正确):识别(100%),反射(100%),交换(94.1%),建设性(93.8%)和分析(93.3%) )。由荣誉调整的双变量随机拦截模型显示出在随后的考试和更好的课程物质理解中提高了考试性能,与讲座学习相比使用主动学习(2.2%对1.2%)进行教导时。学生调查揭示了积极趋势的积极趋势,在活跃学习的感知个人实用部件(Tau = 0.21,P = 0.014)中,但不是其他组成部分(普通理论效用和团队情况)。我们将我们的调查结果应用于Covid-19大流行,并为新修改的在线课程建议了积极的学习改编。总体而言,我们的结果表明主动学习亚型可能有助于区分学生理解,提供额外的证据,即积极学习对学生理解更有利,并表明学生对主动学习的看法是积极的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号