...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Efficiency of the Wilks and IPF Formulas at Comparing Maximal Strength Regardless of Bodyweight through Analysis of the Open Powerlifting Database
【24h】

Efficiency of the Wilks and IPF Formulas at Comparing Maximal Strength Regardless of Bodyweight through Analysis of the Open Powerlifting Database

机译:威尔克斯和IPF公式的效率在比较最大强度,无论通过分析开放的Powerliftation数据库的体重

获取原文

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 13(4): 567-582, 2020. The purpose of this study was to measure the efficiency of the Wilks and International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) Formulas at comparing powerlifting performance (total) between weight classes of the same sex (men and women) and division (classic and equipped) in order to determine the champion of champions. The Open Powerlifting database was downloaded (June 21st, 2019), filtered (Python) and analyzed (IBM SPSS). Single factor ANOVA revealed that the total (kg) was able to compare 3 out of the 98 weight class comparison possibilities (3.1%), the total ratio was able to compare 5 of the 98 weight class comparison possibilities (5.1%), the Wilks Formula was able to compare 53 of the 98 weight class comparison possibilities (54.1%) and that the IPF formula was able to compare 51 of the 98 weight class comparison possibilities (52%). Making the Wilks slightly more efficient than the IPF Formula (54.1% 52%) at determining the champion of champions. Results also show that the IPF Formula is more efficient at comparing women’s weight classes and that the Wilks Formula is more efficient at comparing men’s weight classes, for both divisions. Results could not validate the IPF’s decision to replace the Wilks by the IPF Formula. Subjects’ performances (kg, ratio, % of the event on the total, Wilks and IPF points) presented for each weight class per sex and division coming from a total of 26,472 open powerlifters could be utilized by practitioners. Further research should be directed towards updating the constants of both formulas.
机译:国际运动科学杂志13(4):567-582,2020。本研究的目的是衡量威尔克斯和国际潜力联合会(IPF)公式的效率在比较相同的重量类之间的Powerlifting Performation(总计)性(男女)和师(经典和装备),以确定冠军的冠军。下载Open Power1ifting数据库(2019年6月21日),过滤(Python)并分析(IBM SPSS)。单一因素Anova揭示总数(千克)能够比较98重量类比较可能性(3.1%),总比率能够比较98重量类比较可能性(5.1%),威尔克斯公式能够比较98重量类比较可能性的53个(54.1%),并且IPF配方能够比较98重量类比较可能性的51个(52%)。在确定冠军的冠军时,使Wilk比IPF公式更有效(54.1%> 52%)。结果还表明,在比较女性的重量类时,IPF公式更有效,并且威尔克斯公式在比较男性的重量班级,对于两个部门进行比较。结果无法通过IPF公式验证IPF替换Wilk的决定。从事从业者可以利用来自总计26,472个开放的Powerlifer的每种重量等级的受试者的表现(kg,威尔克斯和IPF点的总和,Wilk和IPF点的总数),从业人员可以使用。进一步的研究应针对更新两种公式的常数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号