...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Saving space: Comparing mini - logMAR with standard logMAR visual acuity
【24h】

Saving space: Comparing mini - logMAR with standard logMAR visual acuity

机译:节省空间:使用标准Logmar视力比较Mini - Logmar

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: Assessing visual acuity (VA) is the cornerstone of an ophthalmic workup and needs VA charts in a four or six meters space. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of distant VA (DVA) on one meter mini-logMAR (MLM) with a standard six meter logMAR (SLM) chart. Methods: We developed a MLM chart to be used at 1 m with 1.0 D spectacles, by reducing the SLM chart designed for 6 meters, to 1/6 th its size, using AutoCAD version 2014. On an initial cohort, we obtained DVA on the two charts by optometrist trainees, masked to the outcomes on the different tests. We performed regression and checked agreement between the two measurements. Subsequently, on a new cohort, we validated the performance of the MLM. Results: Of the 56 initial subjects, mean DVA with SLM was 0.44 ± 0.13 and with MLM was 0.45 ± 0.13; mean difference of -0.01 ± 0.02, 95%CI: 0.007 to 0.018; P 0.0001 on paired t-test. There was a significant correlation: r = 0.99; r 2 = 0.98, P 0.0001. On an average, DVA with MLM was less than a letter worse than with SLM. The regression formula obtained: SLM DVA = -0.1312 1.0014 x (MLM DVA). The validation study revealed no significant difference (P = 0.29) between the predicted standard DVA calculated by the regression formula and the actual standard. Conclusion: We suggest that we can deduce distance logMAR VA from a mini-logMAR chart as devised and used by us. This will take less space, be portable and allow congenial interaction with patients.
机译:目的:评估视力(VA)是眼科工作的基石,并在四六米的空间中需要VA图表。本研究的目的是将遥感VA(DVA)的性能与标准的六米Logmar(SLM)图表进行一米米的迷你记录(MLM)。方法:通过将设计为6米的SLM图表,通过AutoCAD版本2014年,我们开发了一个MLM图,以1米以1米使用1.0 d眼镜。在初始队列中,我们在初始队列中获得了1/6尺寸。在初始队列中,我们获得了DVA验光师学员的两张图表,掩盖了不同测试的结果。我们在两次测量之间进行了回归并检查了同意。随后,在新的队列上,我们验证了MLM的性能。结果:在56个初始对象中,具有SLM的平均DVA为0.44±0.13,MLM为0.45±0.13;平均差异-0.01±0.02,95%CI:0.007至0.018; P <0.0001对配对T检验。有显着的相关性:r = 0.99; R 2 = 0.98,P <0.0001。平均而言,带有MLM的DVA小于比SLM更糟糕的信。获得的回归公式:SLM DVA = -0.1312 1.0014 x(MLM DVA)。验证研究显示通过回归公式计算的预测标准DVA与实际标准之间没有显着差异(p = 0.29)。结论:我们建议我们可以将距离Logmar VA推向迷你记录图,如我们所设计和使用的。这将采用较少的空间,便携,并允许与患者的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号