...
首页> 外文期刊>Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry >Screening for Myopia and Refractive Errors Using LogMAR Visual Acuity by Optometrists and a Simplified Visual Acuity Chart by Nurses.
【24h】

Screening for Myopia and Refractive Errors Using LogMAR Visual Acuity by Optometrists and a Simplified Visual Acuity Chart by Nurses.

机译:验光师使用LogMAR视力和护士简化的视力表筛查近视和屈光不正。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE.: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of a widespread method of screening for refractive errors in Singapore schoolchildren using a simplified acuity screening chart with a more rigorous method using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. A secondary aim is to estimate the best cutoff values for the detection of refractive errors using these two methods. METHODS.: This is a population-based study, involving 1779 schoolchildren from three schools in Singapore. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was recorded using a modified Bailey-Lovie chart by trained optometrists, and visual acuity measurement was also undertaken using a simplified 7-line visual acuity screening chart by school health nurses. The main outcome measures were the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC's) of logMAR and the simplified screening visual acuity to detect myopia or any refractive errors. The difference between measurements, simplified screening visual acuity - logMAR visual acuity, was calculated. RESULTS.: The optimal threshold using the simplified screening visual acuity chart for the detection of myopia or any refractive error was 6/12 or worse. Using logMAR visual acuity, the most efficient threshold for the detection of myopia was 0.26, but this was 0.18 for the detection of any refractive error. The area under the ROC curves was significantly greater in the case of the logMAR visual acuity measurement compared with the simplified screening visual acuity measurement for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors. The 95% limits of agreement for the two methods (simplified screening - logMAR acuity) was -0.219 to +0.339. CONCLUSIONS.: Bearing in mind that the visual acuity measurements were performed by two different groups of professionals, visual acuity screening using the ETDRS method appears to be more accurate than the simplified charts for the detection of myopia or any refractive errors in children.
机译:目的:为了比较新加坡学龄儿童使用简化的敏锐度筛查图和更严格的方法使用早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)图筛查屈光不正的广泛方法的敏感性和特异性。第二个目的是估计使用这两种方法检测屈光不正的最佳截止值。方法:这是一项基于人群的研究,涉及来自新加坡三所学校的1779名学童。由经过培训的验光师使用改良的Bailey-Lovie图表记录最小分辨角(logMAR)视敏度的对数,并由学校卫生护士使用简化的7线视敏度筛查图进行视敏度测量。主要结果指标是logMAR的接收者操作特征(ROC)和简化的筛查视力以检测近视或任何屈光不正。计算测量值之间的差异,即简化筛查视力-logMAR视力。结果:使用简化的筛查视力表检测近视或任何屈光不正的最佳阈值为6/12或更差。使用logMAR视敏度,检测近视的最有效阈值为0.26,但检测任何屈光不正的阈值为0.18。与用于检测近视或任何屈光不正的简化筛查视力测量相比,logMAR视力测量的情况下,ROC曲线下的面积明显更大。两种方法(简化筛选-logMAR视敏度)的一致性的95%限制为-0.219至+0.339。结论:鉴于视力测量是由两组不同的专业人员进行的,因此,使用ETDRS方法进行视力筛查似乎比简化图用于检测儿童近视或任何屈光不正更为准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号