首页> 外文期刊>Animals >Opinion of Belgian Egg Farmers on Hen Welfare and Its Relationship with Housing Type
【24h】

Opinion of Belgian Egg Farmers on Hen Welfare and Its Relationship with Housing Type

机译:比利时鸡蛋农民对母鸡福利及其与住房型关系的看法

获取原文
           

摘要

Simple Summary Until 2012, laying hens in the EU were often housed in conventional cages that offered limited space and few opportunities to perform highly motivated behaviors. Conventional cages are now banned in the EU in order to improve animal welfare. In this study, egg farmers were surveyed (winter 2013–2014) to assess whether they perceived any changes in animal welfare since changing housing systems, what role hen welfare played in choosing a new housing system, and which aspects of hen welfare they find most important. The data show that the answers differ depending on which housing system the farmers currently use and whether they had used conventional cages in the past. Abstract As of 2012, the EU has banned the use of conventional cages (CC) for laying hens, causing a shift in housing systems. This study’s aim was to gain insight into farmers’ opinions on hen health and welfare in their current housing systems. A survey was sent to 218 Belgian egg farmers, of which 127 (58.3%) responded, with 84 still active as egg farmer. Hen welfare tended to be less important in choosing the housing system for farmers with cage than with non-cage systems. Respondents currently using cage systems were more satisfied with hen health than respondents with non-cage systems. Reported mortality increased with farm size and was higher in furnished cages than in floor housing. Feather pecking, cannibalism, smothering and mortality were perceived to be higher in current housing systems than in CC, but only by respondents who shifted to non-cage systems from previously having had CC. Health- and production-related parameters were scored to be more important for hen welfare as compared to behavior-related parameters. Those without CC in the past rated factors relating to natural behavior to be more important for welfare than those with CC. This difference in opinion based on farmer backgrounds should be taken into account in future research.
机译:简单的摘要直到2012年,欧盟铺设母鸡常常被居住在传统的笼子里,提供有限的空间,很少有机会执行高度动机的行为。现在禁止在欧盟禁止传统笼子,以改善动物福利。在这项研究中,鸡蛋农民进行了调查(2013-2014冬季),以评估他们是否在改变住房系统时感知动物福利的任何变化,在选择一个新的住房系统时扮演的母鸡福利以及他们发现的母鸡福利的哪些方面重要的。数据显示,答案因农民目前使用的住房系统以及它们是否过去使用传统笼子而异。摘要截至2012年,欧盟禁止使用传统笼子(CC)来铺设母鸡,导致住房系统的换档。本研究的目的是深入了解农民对当前住房系统中母鸡健康和福利的看法。一项调查被送到218名比利时鸡蛋农民,其中127名(58.3%)回应,84名仍然活跃作为鸡蛋农民。母鸡福利往往不太重要,在选择带有笼子的农民的住房系统而不是与非笼式系统。目前使用笼子系统的受访者对母鸡健康更满意,而不是具有非笼系统的受访者。报告的死亡率随着农场的规模而增加,家具笼子较高,而不是在地板外壳中。羽毛啄食,摄入同学,窒息和死亡率在当前的住房系统中比在CC中更高,而是仅被转移到非笼系统的受访者从先前具有CC。与行为相关的参数相比,对健康和生产相关参数进行评分为母鸡福利更为重要。没有CC的那些与自然行为有关的因素,对福利更重要而不是CC。在未来的研究中,应考虑到基于农民背景的这种意见差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号