首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science >Effects of litter floor access and inclusion of experienced hens in aviary housing on floor eggs, litter condition, air quality, and hen welfare
【24h】

Effects of litter floor access and inclusion of experienced hens in aviary housing on floor eggs, litter condition, air quality, and hen welfare

机译:垃圾楼层进入及禽舍在地板鸡蛋,垃圾条件,空气质量和母鸡福利上的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With different cage-free (CF) housing styles and management schemes, retailers have developed their own CF criteria. One highly debated aspect is if hens may be kept inside the system for part of the day-during the first few hours after lights-on. Research is lacking regarding the impacts of such a practice on hen welfare, incidence of eggs laid on the litter floor, litter condition, and air quality. This 14-mo field study was conducted to help assess such impacts. Hens (Dekalb White) in an aviary house (50,000-hen nominal capacity) were allowed to have full litter access (FLA) vs. part-time litter access (PLA) from 10: 50 am to 9: 00 pm, coupled with the absence or presence of experienced hens (1.5% of the population), hence a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. The measured variables included a) incidence of floor eggs, b) percentage of birds remaining on litter floor at night, c) mortality, d) body weight (BW) and BW uniformity, e) litter condition (depth, moisture content, texture, amount removed, and bacteria concentration), f) environmental conditions, and g) welfare conditions (10 variables). Compared to FLA, PLA had a significantly lower incidence of floor eggs (1.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 12.6 +/- 1.1 eggs per hen housed as of 76 weeks of age (WOA), i.e., approximately 89% reduction), less manure deposition on the floor (0.53 +/- 0.02 vs. 1.05 +/- 0.04 kg/100 hens/d, dry basis, i.e., approximately 50% reduction), and lower ammonia concentrations due to drier litter (averaging 22% lower). Inclusion of 1.5% experienced hens in the young flock did not show benefit of reducing the incidence of floor eggs (P = 0.48). The percentage of hens remaining on the floor at night was low ( 0.01%) in all cases from 24 WOA onward. No differences were detected between FLA and PLA in hen welfare conditions, mortality, BW, BW uniformity, bacteria concentration in the litter, air temperature, or relative humidity.
机译:凭借不同的笼子(CF)住宅款式和管理计划,零售商开发了自己的CF标准。一个高度讨论的方面是如果母鸡可以在系统的一天内保存在系统内 - 在灯光开启后的最初几个小时内。关于这种做法对母鸡福利的影响,缺乏对垃圾楼层,垃圾条件和空气质量的影响的影响。进行了这项14-Mo现场研究以帮助评估这些影响。允许母牛(Dekalb White)在禽房(50,000母鸡的标称容量)有完整的垃圾接入(FLA)与兼职垃圾接入(PLA)从10:50至9:00下午9点到9:00,加上缺席或存在经验丰富的母鸡(1.5%的人口),因此是2 x 2因子安排。测量的变量包括a)地板蛋的发生率,b)在夜间垃圾楼层留下的鸟类百分比,c)死亡率,d)体重(bw)和bw均匀性,e)凋落物状况(深度,水分含量,质地,除去量,细菌浓度),f)环境条件和g)福利条件(10个变量)。与FLA相比,PLA具有显着降低的地板卵发病率(1.4 +/- 0.1与12.6 +/- 1.1鸡蛋,每母鸡为76周(WOA),即减少约89%)沉积在地板上(0.53 +/- 0.02与1.05 +/- 0.04 kg / 100亨/ d,干基,即减少约50%,降低氨浓度(平均下降22%)。在年轻的羊群中包含1.5%的经验丰富的母鸡并未表现出降低地板蛋的发生率(P = 0.48)的好处。在夜间留在地板上的母鸡的百分比低(& 0.01%),所有情况下都是从24 WOA的情况下。在母鸡福利条件下的FLA和PLA之间没有检测到差异,死亡率,BW,BW均匀性,凋落物,空气温度或相对湿度的细菌浓度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号