首页> 外文期刊>Clinics >Percutaneous endoscopic versus surgical gastrostomy in patients with benign and malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Percutaneous endoscopic versus surgical gastrostomy in patients with benign and malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:良性和恶性疾病患者的经皮内窥镜与外科胃术:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

To compare the complications and mortality related to gastrostomy procedures performed using surgical and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques, this review covered seven studies. Five of these were retrospective and two were randomized prospective studies. In total, 406 patients were involved, 232 of whom had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and 174 of whom had undergone surgical gastrostomy. The analysis was performed using Review Manager. Risk differences were computed using a fixed-effects model and forest and funnel plots. Data on risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using the Mantel-Haenszel test. There was no difference in major complications in retrospective (95% CI (-0.11 to 0.10)) or randomized (95% CI (-0.07 to 0.05)) studies. Regarding minor complications, no difference was found in retrospective studies (95% CI (-00.17 to 0.09)), whereas a difference was observed in randomized studies (95% CI (-0.25 to -0.02)). Separate analyses of retrospective and randomized studies revealed no differences between the methods in relation to mortality and major complications. Moreover, low levels of minor complications were observed among endoscopic procedures in randomized studies, with no difference observed compared with retrospective studies.
机译:为了比较使用手术和经皮内镜胃术技术进行的与胃术手术相关的并发症和死亡,这篇综述涉及七项研究。其中五个是回顾性,两者是随机的前瞻性研究。总共有406名患者,其中232人经过经过经皮内窥镜胃痛术,其中174名患有手术性胃囊组织。使用审核经理进行分析。使用固定效果模型和森林和漏斗图计算风险差异。使用Mantel-Haenszel试验获得有关风险差异和95%置信区间的数据。回顾性的主要并发症(95%CI(-0.11至0.10))或随机化(95%CI(-0.07至0.05))的研究没有差异。关于轻微并发症,回顾性研究没有发现差异(95%CI(-00.17至0.09)),而在随机研究中观察到差异(95%CI(-0.25至-0.02))。分离回顾性和随机研究的分析揭示了与死亡率相关的方法与主要并发症的差异。此外,随机研究中的内镜手术中观察到低水平的轻微并发症,与回顾性研究相比,没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号