首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment
【24h】

Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment

机译:凡人的驾驶员在较旧的司机自我监管实践,没有轻度认知障碍

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To assess the impact of cognitive, socio-demographic and driving-related characteristics on self-regulation practices in older drivers with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (determined by the Telephone Cognitive Screen (T-CogS) score), compared with drivers with no cognitive impairment. Design, Setting, Participants: A cross-sectional study collected information from 362 drivers with MCI and 611 drivers with no cognitive impairment, who were aged 65+ years, and were living in Western Australia between November 2018 and February 2019. Measurements: Self-reported self-regulation driving practices. Results: The majority of drivers with MCI (62.4%) and those with no cognitive impairment (57.1%) reported self-regulating their driving in at least one situation, in the past three months. The most common situations that both groups of drivers self-regulated in were “driving at night in the rain”, “parallel parking”, and “driving when raining”. Drivers with MCI were only significantly more likely to self-regulate when “making turns across oncoming traffic” and “driving at night”. They also had 39% greater odds of self-regulating in at least one driving situation, compared with drivers with no cognitive impairment (OR: 1.39, 95% CI=1.04– 1.85, p=0.02). Females also had 2.3 times greater odds of self-regulating (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.76– 3.12, p 0.001). Drivers aged 75+ years had 1.6 times greater odds of self-regulating, compared with drivers aged 65– 69 years (OR=1.58, 95% CI=1.12– 2.23, p=0.01). Conclusion: Older drivers with MCI were more likely to self-regulate their driving, compared to drivers with no cognitive impairment, particularly in complex driving situations. This suggests that some drivers with MCI may be able to recognize their cognitive limitations and adjust their driving accordingly. However, several drivers with MCI, particularly males, did not self-regulate their driving. This highlights the importance of advising patients about the impact of MCI on driving ability, suitable self-regulation strategies, as well as monitoring their driving ability.
机译:目的:评估认知,社会人口和驾驶相关特征对具有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的旧驾驶员中的自我监管实践(由电话认知筛选(T-Cogs)得分),与司机相比没有认知障碍。设计,设定,参与者:横断面研究从362名司机的信息收集了MCI和611个司机,没有认知障碍,年龄在65岁以上的认知障碍,并在2018年11月和2019年2月之间生活在澳大利亚。测量:自我报告了自我规定的驾驶实践。结果:大多数具有MCI(62.4%)和没有认知障碍的司机(57.1%)报告在过去三个月内至少有一种情况下的自我规范。最常见的情况下,驾驶员群体自我监管的是“在雨中驾驶”,“平行停车”,“在下雨时驾驶”。当“在迎面而来的交通交通”和“晚上驾驶”时,驾驶员仍然显着更有可能自我规范。与没有认知障碍的司机(或:1.39,95%CI = 1.04-1.85,P = 0.02)相比,它们在至少一个驾驶情况下,它们也有39%的自我调节措施。雌性的自我调节的几率也具有2.3倍(或= 2.34,95%CI = 1.76- 3.12,P <0.001)。 75岁以上75岁的司机的自我调节可能性比65-69岁(或= 1.58,95%CI = 1.12- 2.23,P = 0.01)相比,自我调节措施的比较幅度为1.6倍。结论:与没有认知障碍的司机相比,使用MCI的旧驱动因素更有可能自我调节驾驶,特别是在复杂的驾驶情况下。这表明一些带有MCI的驱动程序可能能够识别他们的认知限制并相应地调整其行驶。然而,有几个具有MCI,特别是男性的司机,并没有自我调节他们的驾驶。这凸显了向患者提供了关于MCI对驾驶能力影响的影响,适当的自我调节策略以及监测其驱动能力的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号