This article presents the results of research on the functioning of the reference and counter-reference system in support of activities carried'/> Evaluation of reference and counter-reference in the Family Health Program at the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro (RJ, Brazil)
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia e Saude Coletiva >Evaluation of reference and counter-reference in the Family Health Program at the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro (RJ, Brazil)
【24h】

Evaluation of reference and counter-reference in the Family Health Program at the Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro (RJ, Brazil)

机译:Rio de Janeiro大都会地区家庭健康计划的参考和反参考评估(巴西RJ)

获取原文
       

摘要

> size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">This article presents the results of research on the functioning of the reference and counter-reference system in support of activities carried out by the Brazilian Family Health Program in the cities of Duque de Caxias (RJ) and Rio de Janeiro. The research had as premise that the resolution capacity of the Brazilian Family Health Program depends on the support of specialist's medical appointments and diagnosis test offered by health care unities of the secondary level, and depends upon reference and counter-reference information. The research's results may be summarized as: (1) limited offer of specialized services in the secondary level of the health care system; (2) nonexistence or failure of counter-reference information; (3) deficient organization of regulation activities; (4) insufficient utilization of clinical guidelines for patient referrals; (5) precariousness of information and communication systems; (6) high level of political influence in the management of health care services; and (7) different denominations and great diversity of types of service offered by secondary health care unities.
机译:> size =“2”面部=“Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif”>本文介绍了参考和反参考系统的运作的研究结果,以支持由此开展的活动巴西家庭健康计划在Duque de Caxias(RJ)和Rio de Janeiro的城市。该研究的前提是巴西家庭健康计划的分辨率取决于专家的医疗任命和次级级别提供的诊断试验,并取决于参考和反对参考信息。该研究的结果可以概括为:(1)卫生保健系统中二级专业服务的有限报价; (2)不存在的反异或反对参考信息; (3)缺乏监管活动组织; (4)患者推荐的临床指南不足以利用临床指南; (5)信息和通信系统的不稳定; (6)医疗保健服务管理中高度的政治影响; (7)次要医疗团体提供的不同面额和巨大的服务类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号