首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Effect of bioelectrical impedance analysis-guided dry weight adjustment, in comparison to standard clinical-guided, on the sleep quality of chronic haemodialysis patients (BEDTIME study): a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Effect of bioelectrical impedance analysis-guided dry weight adjustment, in comparison to standard clinical-guided, on the sleep quality of chronic haemodialysis patients (BEDTIME study): a randomised controlled trial

机译:生物电阻抗分析的影响 - 与标准临床引导相比,慢性血液透析患者睡眠质量(睡前研究):随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Sleep disturbance is common among chronic haemodialysis patients, which leads to poor quality of life, in addition to increased instances of morbidity and mortality. Hypervolemia has been linked to sleep problems observed in chronic haemodialysis patients, which suggests that optimising one's fluid status could improve the sleep quality of this patient group. In our study, we subjectively examined and objectively measured sleep parameters, using actigraphy recordings, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), in order to compare bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-guided and standard clinical-guided dry weight adjustment. We randomly selected 19 chronic haemodialysis patients with subclinical hypervolemia, defined as a clinically euvolemic status, despite the ratio of extracellular water to total body water being more than 0.4 in BIA. Furthermore, these patients, who were poor sleepers (PSQI ?5), were assigned to either a BIA-guided dry weight group (BIA group) or a standard clinical-guided one (clinical group). The primary outcome was changes in sleep actigraphy parameters between the groups at 1, 3, and 6?months. Changes observed in the PSQI and ESS score between the two groups over the same period of time were the secondary endpoints. The mean age of the participants was 63.53?±?11.12?years, and 42% of them were male. All sleep parameters measured by means of actigraphy were not significantly different between the two groups. Interestingly, at 3 and 6?months, the subjective sleep quality significantly improved in the BIA group, as reflected by a greater decline in the PSQI score, in comparison with the clinical group (3?months: mean difference?-?1.82 [-?3.13 to -?0.51], P?=?0.006; 6?months: mean difference?-?3.16 [-?4.49 to -?1.83], P???0.001). However, sleepiness assessed by the ESS was not significantly different between the groups throughout the study. Optimisation of the fluid status by employing BIA did not improves sleep actigraphy parameter, however, it significantly ameliorates the subjective sleep quality of chronic haemodialysis patients. This observation should be further explored in larger samples and longer clinical trials. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02825589 ) on July 7, 2016.
机译:睡眠障碍是慢性血液透析患者中​​常见的,这导致生活质量差,除了发病率和死亡的情况。高渗血症已被联系到慢性血液透析患者中​​观察到的睡眠问题,这表明优化一个人的流体状态可以提高该患者组的睡眠质量。在我们的研究中,我们主观地检查和客观地测量了睡眠参数,采用了匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)问卷和欧盟睡眠量表(ESS),以比较生物电阻抗分析(BIA) - 术和标准临床-geed干重调整。我们随机选择了19例患有亚临床血型血症的慢性血液透析患者,定义为临床兴高采烈的地位,尽管细胞外水与BIA的总体水的总体水比例为0.4。此外,这些患者患者贫困睡眠者(PSQI>?5)被分配给BIA引导的干重基团(BIA组)或标准临床引导(临床组)。主要结果是在1,3和6个月的群体之间的睡眠激光参数变化。在同一时间段内在两组之间观察到的PSQI和ESS分数的变化是辅助端点。参与者的平均年龄为63.53?±11.12?年,其中42%是男性。通过戏剧性测量的所有睡眠参数在两组之间没有显着差异。有趣的是,在3和6个月的时间,比亚集团的主观睡眠质量显着改善,与临床组相比,PSQI评分的更大衰退(3?月:平均差异? - ?1.82 [ - ?3.13至 - ?0.51],p?= 0.006; 6?月:平均差异? - ?3.16 [ - α.49至 - ?1.83],p?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号