...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students

机译:随机对照试验的反馈,提高医学生的患者满意度和咨询技巧

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use of feedback has been integral to medical student learning, but rigorous evidence to evaluate its education effect is limited, especially in the role of patient feedback in clinical teaching and practice improvement. The aim of the Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) Feedback Study was to evaluate whether additional written consumer feedback on patient satisfaction improved consultation skills among medical students and whether multisource feedback (MSF) improved student performance. In this single site, double-blinded randomised controlled trial, 71 eligible medical students from two universities in their first clinical year were allocated to intervention or control and followed up for one semester. They participated in five simulated student-led consultations in a teaching clinic with patient volunteers living with chronic illness. Students in the intervention group received additional written feedback on patient satisfaction combined with guided self-reflection. The control group received usual immediate formative multisource feedback from tutors, patients and peers. Student characteristics, baseline patient-rated satisfaction scores and tutor-rated consultation skills were measured. Follow-up assessments were complete in 70 students attending the MSF program. At the final consultation episodes, both groups improved patient-rated rapport (P?=?0.002), tutor-rated patient-centeredness and tutor-rated overall consultation skills (P?=?0.01). The intervention group showed significantly better tutor-rated patient-centeredness (P?=?0.003) comparing with the control group. Distress relief, communication comfort, rapport reported by patients and tutor-rated clinical skills did not differ significantly between the two groups. The innovative multisource feedback program effectively improved consultation skills in medical students. Structured written consumer feedback combined with guided student reflection further improved patient-centred practice and effectively enhanced the benefit of an MSF model. This strategy might provide a valuable adjunct to communication skills education for medical students. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12613001055796 .
机译:反馈的使用对医学学生的学习一直是一体化的,但评估其教育效果的严格证据是有限的,特别是在患者反馈在临床教学中的作用和实践改进的作用。患者教学助理(PTA)反馈研究的目的是评估关于患者满意度的其他书面消费反馈是否改善了医学生的咨询技能以及多源反馈(MSF)改善了学生表现。在本次网站上,双盲随机对照试验,71名临床一年中的两个大学的合格医学生进行分配给干预或控制并随后进行一个学期。他们参加了五个模拟的学生LED咨询,患有慢性疾病的患者志愿者。干预组的学生收到了患者满意度的额外书面反馈,结合引导自我反思。对照组从导师,患者和同行接收到通常的立即形成多源反馈。衡量了学生特征,基线患者额定满意度和导师额定咨询技能。在70名学生参加MSF计划中完成后续评估。在最终咨询剧集中,两组都改善了患者额定的伴侣的关系(P?= 0.002),导师额定患者中心和导师的整体咨询技能(P?= 0.01)。与对照组相比,干预组显示出更好的导师额定患者中心(P?= 0.003)。遇险救济,沟通舒适,患者报告的伴侣和导师级的临床技能在两组之间没有显着差异。创新的多源反馈计划有效地改善了医学生的咨询技巧。结构化书面消费者反馈结合引导学生反思进一步改善了患者以患者为中心的实践,有效地提高了MSF模型的益处。该策略可能提供有价值的医学生沟通技能教育辅助。澳大利亚新西兰临床试验登记号码ACTRN12613001055796

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号