首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study
【24h】

Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study

机译:牙科学生证据牙科竞争力的适应与验证:试点研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this pilot study was to create a valid and reliable set of assessment questions for examining Evidence-based Dentistry (EbD) knowledge. For this reason, we adapted and validated for dental students the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), which assesses Evidence-based Medicine (EbM) abilities. The Berlin Questionnaire was validated with medical residents. We adapted it for use in a dentistry setting. An expert panel reviewed the adapted BQ for content validity. A cross-sectional cohort representing four training levels (EbD-novice dental students, EbD-trained dental students, dentists, and EbM?/EbD-expert faculty) completed the questionnaire. A total of 140 participants comprised the validation set. Internal reliability, item difficulty and item discrimination were assessed. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the mean total scores of students to faculty and comparing proportions of students and faculty who passed each item. Among the 133 participants (52 EbD-novice dental students, 53 EbD-trained dental students, 12 dentists, and 16 EbM-/ EbD-expert faculty), a statistically significant (p??0.001) difference was evident in the total score corresponding to the training level. The total score reliability and psychometric properties of items modified for discipline-specific content were acceptable. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.648. The adapted Berlin Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument to assess competence in Evidence-based Dentistry in dental students. Future research will focus on refining the instrument further.
机译:该试点研究的目的是为检查基于证据的牙科(EBD)知识来创建一个有效且可靠的评估问题一套。出于这个原因,我们改编和验证了牙科学生柏林问卷(BQ),评估了基于证据的药物(ebm)能力。柏林问卷由医疗居民验证。我们调整了牙科环境中的使用。专家小组审查了适应的BQ以进行内容有效性。代表四个培训水平的横断面伙伴(EBD-----培训牙科学生,培训牙科学生,牙医和ebm?/ EBD-专业学院)完成了调查问卷。共有140名参与者组成了验证集。内部可靠性,评估物品难度和项目歧视。通过将学生的平均总数与传递每个项目的学生和学院的比较来评估构建有效性。在133名参与者中(52名EBD-of牙科学生,53名培训培训的牙科学生,12名牙医和16名EBM- / EBD-专家学院),在总分中显而易见的是统计学意义(P?<0.001)差异对应培训水平。为纪律特定内容修改的项目的总分可靠性和心理测量特性是可接受的。 Cronbach的Alpha为0.648。适应的柏林调查问卷是一种可靠的有效的仪器,可评估牙科学生证据的牙科的能力。未来的研究将专注于进一步精炼乐器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号