...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: a national survey
【24h】

Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: a national survey

机译:美国学术院学院生产力评估美国:国家调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Faculty productivity is essential for academic medical centers striving to achieve excellence and national recognition. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether and how academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation. Methods We surveyed the Chairs of academic Departments of Medicine in the United States in 2012. We sent a paper-based questionnaire along with a personalized invitation letter by postal mail. For non-responders, we sent reminder letters, then called them and faxed them the questionnaire. The questionnaire included 8 questions with 23 tabulated close-ended items about the types of productivity measured (clinical, research, teaching, administrative) and the measurement strategies used. We conducted descriptive analyses. Results Chairs of 78 of 152 eligible departments responded to the survey (51% response rate). Overall, 82% of respondents reported measuring at least one type of faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation. Amongst those measuring faculty productivity, types measured were: clinical (98%), research (61%), teaching (62%), and administrative (64%). Percentages of respondents who reported the use of standardized measurements units (e.g., Relative Value Units (RVUs)) varied from 17% for administrative productivity to 95% for research productivity. Departments reported a wide variation of what exact activities are measured and how they are monetarily compensated. Most compensation plans take into account academic rank (77%). The majority of compensation plans are in the form of a bonus on top of a fixed salary (66%) and/or an adjustment of salary based on previous period productivity (55%). Conclusion Our survey suggests that most academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity and convert it into standardized units for the purpose of salary compensation. The exact activities that are measured and how they are monetarily compensated varied substantially across departments.
机译:背景技术教师生产力对于努力实现卓越和国家认可的学术医疗中心至关重要。本研究的目的是评估美国在美国的学术部门是否以及如何衡量薪酬赔偿的职业生产力。方法在2012年调查了美国在美国学术部门的学术主席。我们通过邮政邮件发送了一份纸质问卷以及个性化邀请函。对于非响应者,我们发送了提醒信,然后叫他们并将其传真给调查问卷。调查问卷包括8个问题,其中23个列表的近端项目,有关测量的生产率的类型(临床,研究,教学,行政)和使用的测量策略。我们进行了描述性分析。结果椅子为78,共152个符合条件的部门响应了调查(51%的响应率)。总体而言,82%的受访者报告衡量至少一种薪资赔偿的教职员工。在测量的衡量教师生产力中,测量类型是:临床(98%),研究(61%),教学(62%)和行政(64%)。报告使用标准化测量单位的受访者的百分比(例如,相对值单位(RVU))从17%变化,导航生产率为95%,以获得研究生产力。部门报告了衡量了确切活动的广泛变化以及它们的单项方式如何补偿。大多数赔偿计划考虑到学术级别(77%)。大部分赔偿计划是奖金的形式,最高固定的薪资(66%)和/或根据前期生产力的薪水调整(55%)。结论我们的调查表明,美国大多数学术部门在美国衡量教师生产力,并将其转换为标准化单位,以便薪酬赔偿。测量的确切活动以及它们如何在各部门跨越各种各样的方式变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号