首页> 外文期刊>BioPsychoSocial Medicine >Affective agnosia: a core affective processing deficit in the alexithymia spectrum
【24h】

Affective agnosia: a core affective processing deficit in the alexithymia spectrum

机译:情感毒性:Alexithymia谱中核心情感加工缺陷

获取原文
           

摘要

Affective agnosia, an impairment in knowing how one feels emotionally, has been described as an extreme deficit in the experience and expression of emotion that may confer heightened risk for adverse medical outcomes. Alexithymia, by contrast, has been proposed as an over-arching construct that includes a spectrum of deficits of varying severity, including affective agnosia at the more severe end. This perspective has been challenged by Taylor and colleagues, who argue that the concept of affective agnosia is unnecessary. We compare these two perspectives by highlighting areas of agreement, reasons for asserting the importance of the affective agnosia concept, errors in Taylor and colleagues’ critique, and measurement issues. The need for performance-based measures of the ability to mentally represent emotional states in addition to metacognitive measures is emphasized. We then draw on a previously proposed three-process model of emotional awareness that distinguishes affective response generation, conceptualization and cognitive control processes which interact to produce a variety of emotional awareness and alexithymia phenotypes - including affective agnosia. The tools for measuring these three processes, their neural substrates, the mechanisms of brain-body interactions that confer heightened risk for adverse medical outcomes, and the differential treatment implications for different kinds of deficits are described. By conceptualizing alexithymia as a spectrum of deficits, the opportunity to match specific deficit mechanisms with personalized treatment for patients will be enhanced.
机译:情感毒性,知道如何在情感上感觉的损害,被描述为可能在可能赋予不良医学结果的风险提升的情感和情感的极端赤字。相比之下,ALEXITIBYMIA被提出为过拱形构建体,其包括不同严重程度的缺点,包括更严重的末端的情感毒性。这种观点受到泰勒及其同事的挑战,他认为不必要的情感毒性的概念。我们通过强调协议领域,对情感无毒性概念,泰勒及其同事批评的重要性的原因进行比较这两个观点,以及泰勒和同事批评的误差和测量问题。在强调,需要基于绩效的绩效措施,除了元认知措施之外,还需要在精神上代表情绪状态。然后,我们借鉴了先前提出的三流程的情感意识模型,以区分情感反应产生,概念化和认知控制过程,这些过程相互作用,产生各种情绪意识和α曲线性缺乏表型 - 包括情感毒性。描述了用于测量这三个过程的工具,它们的神经基材,赋予赋予不良医学结果风险的脑体相互作用的机制以及对不同种类缺陷的差动治疗的影响。通过概念化亚伦思西亚,作为一系列缺陷,将加强对患者个性化治疗的特定赤字机制匹配特定的赤字机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号