首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vision >Your Brain Doesn't Know: A Visual P300 Experiment of The Dress
【24h】

Your Brain Doesn't Know: A Visual P300 Experiment of The Dress

机译:您的大脑不知道:着装的视觉P300实验

获取原文

摘要

Whether The Dress is blue and black, white and gold, or just plain ugly, one thing is certaina??it is guaranteed to generate passionate discussion. Lafer-Sousa et al. (2015) and Gegenfurtner et al. (2015) demonstrated substantial individual differences in the perceived color of The Dress. Here, we asked whether differences in perception of the ambiguous dress affect neural responses measured using electroencephalography (EEG) in a simple deviant-detection experiment. Our stimuli comprised three images (from Wired magazine), the original ambiguous photo and two whose luminance and color cast were manipulated to force either the blue/black or white/gold percept of the foreground dress. All three images had identical background luminance and color. Subjects viewed a stream of images (displayed for 700 ms; inter-stimulus interval 1000 ms) comprising one standard image (80% of trials), and two randomly-occurring deviants (10% of trials each). Subjects were instructed to identify deviant stimuli via keypress. Each image served as the standard in one block of 500 trials, and as a deviant in two other blocks. We recorded EEG scalp potentials elicited by the onset of each stimulus while subjects performed this task. The visual P300 was reliably evoked by deviant images, consistent with the fact that the deviant detection task was relatively easy (behavioral accuracy 90%). We also observed stimulus-driven effects on the magnitude and latency of the P300. When the ambiguous image served as the standard, white/gold deviants elicited stronger responses than blue/black deviants. This effect did not depend on individuals' percepts of the ambiguous image; the P300 was independent of whether subjects perceived white/gold or blue/black. Our results suggest that early deviant detection processes respond to low-level stimulus characteristics and do not reflect perception of color category.
机译:无论是蓝色和黑色,白色和金色,还是仅是丑陋的连衣裙,都可以肯定一件事?一定会引起热烈的讨论。 Lafer-Sousa等。 (2015)和Gegenfurtner等人。 (2015年)在《服饰》的色彩认知方面存在重大个体差异。在这里,我们询问在一个简单的异常检测实验中,对dress昧服饰的感知差异是否会影响使用脑电图(EEG)测量的神经反应。我们的刺激包括三幅图像(来自《连线》杂志),原始的模糊照片以及两幅其亮度和偏色被操纵以迫使前景穿着的蓝色/黑色或白色/金色感知。所有三个图像都具有相同的背景亮度和颜色。受试者观看了图像流(显示700毫秒;刺激间隔1000毫秒),其中包括一个标准图像(试验的80%)和两个随机出现的偏差(每个试验的10%)。指示受试者通过按键识别异常刺激。每个图像在500个试验的一个区块中作为标准,在另外两个区块中则作为偏差。我们记录了受试者执行此任务时每种刺激的发作引起的脑电图皮头皮电位。视觉P300被异常图像可靠地诱发,这与异常检测任务相对容易(行为准确度> 90%)这一事实相吻合。我们还观察到了刺激驱动的效应对P300的大小和延迟的影响。当模糊的图像作为标准图像时,白色/金色偏差比蓝色/黑色偏差引起更强的响应。这种效果不取决于个人对模棱两可图像的感知; P300与被摄对象是白/金还是蓝/黑无关。我们的结果表明,早期的异常检测过程会响应低级刺激特征,并且不能反映对颜色类别的感知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号