Chest Compressions at Least as Good as Chest Compressions Plus Rescue Breathing for Bystander CPR

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the National Medical Association >Chest Compressions at Least as Good as Chest Compressions Plus Rescue Breathing for Bystander CPR

【24h】

Chest Compressions at Least as Good as Chest Compressions Plus Rescue Breathing for Bystander CPR

机译：旁观心肺复苏术的胸外按压效果与胸外按压加急救呼吸一样好

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Get Access Share Export Journal of the National Medical Association Volume 102, Issue 11, November 2010, Page 1110 infopoems Chest Compressions at Least as Good as Chest Compressions Plus Rescue Breathing for Bystander CPR Show more https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30743-4 Get rights and content Previous Recommended articles Citing articles (0) Copyright .

机译：获取访问共享全国医学协会出口杂志第102卷，第11期，2010年11月，第1110页infopoems胸部按压的效果与胸部按压以及旁观者心肺复苏术的救援效果不尽相同显示更多https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027 -9684（15）30743-4获取权利和内容先前的推荐文章引用文章（0）版权。

著录项

来源
《Journal of the National Medical Association》 |2010年第11期|共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类预防医学、卫生学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Bystander fatigue and CPR quality by older bystanders: a randomized crossover trial comparing continuous chest compressions and 30:2 compressions to ventilations [J] . Shawn Liu, Christian Vaillancourt, Ann Kasaboski, Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine . 2016,第6期

机译：老年旁观者的旁观者疲劳和心肺复苏质量：一项随机交叉试验，比较连续胸部按压和30：2按压对通气的影响
2. Comparison of chest compression quality between the modified chest compression method with the use of smartphone application and the standardized traditional chest compression method during CPR [J] . ParkS.-S. Technology and health care: official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine . 2014,第3期

机译：心肺复苏术中使用智能手机应用程序的改良胸部按压方法与标准传统胸部按压方法之间的胸部按压质量比较
3. Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR. [J] . Nishiyama C, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Resuscitation. . 2010,第9期

机译：连续进行心肺复苏术时胸部按压的质量;胸外按压心肺复苏术与常规心肺复苏术之间的比较。
4. Kinect Modelling of Chest Compressions - A Feasibility Study for Chest Compression Depth Measurement Using Digital Strategies [C] . Øyvind Meinich-Bache, Kjersti Engan, Trygve Eftestøl, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing . 2018

机译：胸部按压的Kinect建模-使用数字策略进行胸部按压深度测量的可行性研究
5. Introducing Simulation Technology for In-Hospital Emergency Department Nurse Training to Improve Four Key Metrics of Chest Compressions and Psychomotor Compliance: Advocacy for Policy Revision through Quality Improvement [D] . Ortiz, Daniel Gerardo. 2020

机译：介绍医院急诊部门护士培训的仿真技术，提高胸部按压和精神统一性的四个关键指标：通过质量改进的政策修订倡导
6. Providing the best chest compression quality: Standard CPR versus chest compressions only in a bystander resuscitation model [O] . Bernhard Rössler, Julius Goschin, Mathias Maleczek, 2020

机译：提供最佳的胸外按压质量：标准CPR与仅在旁观者复苏模型中进行胸外按压
7. Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression-only CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial [O] . 2014

机译：标准30：2心肺复苏术与仅胸部按压的心肺复苏术之间心肺复苏质量和救助者疲劳的比较：一项随机交叉人体模型试验

Chest Compressions at Least as Good as Chest Compressions Plus Rescue Breathing for Bystander CPR

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅