首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR.
【24h】

Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR.

机译:连续进行心肺复苏术时胸部按压的质量;胸外按压心肺复苏术与常规心肺复苏术之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the time-dependent deterioration of chest compressions between chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and conventional CPR. METHODS: This study involved 106 and 107 participants randomly assigned to chest compression-only CPR training and conventional CPR training, respectively. Immediately after training, participants were asked to perform CPR for 2 min and the quality of their CPR skills were evaluated. The number of chest compressions in total and those with appropriate depth were counted every 20-s CPR period from the start of CPR. The primary outcome was the CPR quality index calculated as the proportion of chest compressions with appropriate depth among total chest compressions. RESULTS: The total number of chest compressions remained stable over time both in the chest compression-only and the conventional CPR groups. The CPR quality index, however, decreased from 86.6+/-25.0 to 58.2+/-36.9 in the chest compression-only CPR group from 0-20 s through 61-80 s. The reduction was greater than in the conventional CPR group (85.9+/-25.5 to 74.3+/-34.0). The difference in the CPR quality index reached statistical significance (p=0.003) at 61-80 s period. CONCLUSIONS: Chest compressions with appropriate depth decreased more rapidly during chest compression-only CPR than conventional CPR. We recommend that CPR providers change their roles every 1 min to maintain the quality of chest compressions during chest compression-only CPR. (UMIN-CTR C0000000321).
机译:目的:本研究旨在比较仅进行胸外按压心肺复苏(CPR)和常规CPR之间的随时间变化的胸外按压恶化情况。方法:本研究分别包括106名和107名参与者,分别随机接受胸部按压CPR训练和常规CPR训练。培训结束后,立即要求参与者进行CPR 2分钟,并评估其CPR技能的质量。从心肺复苏开始后的每20 s CPR周期计算一次总的胸部按压次数和具有适当深度的按压次数。主要结果是CPR质量指数,计算为总胸部按压中具有适当深度的胸部按压的比例。结果:仅胸部按压组和常规心肺复苏组的胸部按压总次数随时间保持稳定。但是,仅胸外按压CPR组的CPR质量指数从86.6 +/- 25.0降低到58.2 +/- 36.9,从0-20 s降低到61-80 s。降低幅度大于常规心肺复苏组(85.9 +/- 25.5至74.3 +/- 34.0)。心肺复苏质量指数的差异在61-80 s期间达到统计学显着性(p = 0.003)。结论:仅进行胸部按压的心肺复苏期间,适当深度的胸部按压比常规CPR更快地降低。我们建议CPR提供者每1分钟更换一次角色,以在仅进行胸部按压的CPR期间维持胸部按压的质量。 (UMIN-CTR C0000000321)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号