首页> 外文期刊>Technology and health care: official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine >Comparison of chest compression quality between the modified chest compression method with the use of smartphone application and the standardized traditional chest compression method during CPR
【24h】

Comparison of chest compression quality between the modified chest compression method with the use of smartphone application and the standardized traditional chest compression method during CPR

机译:心肺复苏术中使用智能手机应用程序的改良胸部按压方法与标准传统胸部按压方法之间的胸部按压质量比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of this study is to grasp difference in quality of chest compression accuracy between the modified chest compression method with the use of smartphone application and the standardized traditional chest compression method. Participants were progressed 64 people except 6 absentees among 70 people who agreed to participation with completing the CPR curriculum. In the classification of group in participants, the modified chest compression method was called as smartphone group (33 people). The standardized chest compression method was called as traditional group (31 people). The common equipments in both groups were used Manikin for practice and Manikin for evaluation. In the meantime, the smartphone group for application was utilized Android and iOS Operating System (OS) of 2 smartphone products (G, i). The measurement period was conducted from September 25th to 26th, 2012. Data analysis was used SPSS WIN 12.0 program. As a result of research, the proper compression depth (mm) was shown the proper compression depth (p< 0.01) in traditional group (53.77 mm) compared to smartphone group (48.35 mm). Even the proper chest compression (%) was formed suitably (p< 0.05) in traditional group (73.96%) more than smartphone group (60.51%). As for the awareness of chest compression accuracy, the traditional group (3.83 points) had the higher awareness of chest compression accuracy (p< 0.001) than the smartphone group (2.32 points). In the questionnaire that was additionally carried out 1 question only in smartphone group, the modified chest compression method with the use of smartphone had the high negative reason in rescuer for occurrence of hand back pain (48.5%) and unstable posture (21.2%).
机译:这项研究的目的是掌握使用智能手机应用程序的改良胸部按压方法与标准化传统胸部按压方法之间胸部按压准确性的差异。参加者有64人进步,同意参加完成心肺复苏课程的70人中有6人缺席。在参与者的分组中,改良的胸部按压方法被称为智能手机分组(33人)。标准化的胸部按压方法被称为传统组(31人)。两组中的通用设备均使用人体模型进行练习,并使用人体模型进行评估。同时,应用程序的智能手机组利用了2种智能手机产品(G,i)的Android和iOS操作系统(OS)。测量期为2012年9月25日至26日。使用SPSS WIN 12.0程序进行数据分析。研究结果显示,与智能手机组(48.35 mm)相比,传统组(53.77 mm)的适当压缩深度(mm)显示为适当的压缩深度(p <0.01)。与智能手机组(60.51%)相比,传统组(73.96%)甚至更能适当地形成胸部按压(%)(p <0.05)。至于对胸部按压准确性的认识,传统组(3.83分)比对智能手机组(2.32点)的认知程度更高(p <0.001)。在仅在智能手机组中仅回答了一个问题的问卷中,使用智能手机的改良胸部按压方法在施救者中产生高的负面原因,导致手背疼痛(48.5%)和姿势不稳定(21.2%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号