...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Using Multi-Response Format Test in the Assessment of Medical Students' Critical Thinking Ability LC10-LC13
【24h】

Using Multi-Response Format Test in the Assessment of Medical Students' Critical Thinking Ability LC10-LC13

机译:使用多响应格式测试评估医学生的批判性思维能力LC10-LC13

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: To evaluate students critical thinking skills effectively, change in assessment practices is must. The assessment of a student?s ability to think critically is a constant challenge, and yet there is considerable debate on the best assessment methods. There is evidence that the intrinsic nature of open and closed-ended response questions is to measure separate cognitive abilities. Aim: To assess critical thinking ability of medical students by using multi-response format of assessment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of 159 undergraduate third-year medical students. All the participants completed the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) consisting of 34 multiple-choice questions to measure general critical thinking skills and a researcherdeveloped test that combines open and closed-ended questions. A researcher-developed 48-question exam, consisting of 8 shortanswers and 5 essay questions, 19 Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ), and 16 True-False (TF) questions, was used to measure critical thinking skills. Correlation analyses were performed using Pearson's coefficient to explore the association between the total scores of tests and subtests. Results: One hundred and fifty-nine students participated in this study. The sample comprised 81 females (51%) and 78 males (49%) with an age range of 20±2.8 years (mean 21.2 years). The response rate was 64.1%. A significant positive correlation was found between types of questions and critical thinking scores, which the correlations of MCQ (r=.82) and essay questions (r=.77) were strongest. The significant positive correlations between multi-response format test and CCTST?s subscales were seen in analysis, evaluation, inference and inductive reasoning. Unlike CCTST subscales, multi-response format test have weak correlation with CCTST total score (r=.45, p=.06). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering multi-response format test in the assessment of critical thinking abilities of medical students by using both open and closedended response questions.
机译:简介:为了有效地评估学生的批判性思维能力,必须改变评估方式。对学生的批判性思考能力的评估是一个长期的挑战,然而,关于最佳评估方法的争论却很多。有证据表明,开放式回答题和封闭式回答题的内在本质是要测量单独的认知能力。目的:采用多反应评估方式,评估医学生的批判性思维能力。材料和方法:对一组159名本科三年级医学生进行了横断面研究。所有参与者均完成了加利福尼亚批判性思维技能测验(CCTST),该测验由34个选择题组成,用以衡量一般性批判性思维技能,而研究人员开发了结合开放式和封闭式问题的测验。由研究人员开发的48个问题的考试用于衡量批判性思维技巧,该考试由8个简短答案和5个论文问题,19个多项选择题(MCQ)和16个真假(TF)问题组成。使用Pearson系数进行相关分析,以探索测试和子测试总分之间的关​​联。结果:159名学生参加了这项研究。样本包括81位女性(51%)和78位男性(49%),年龄范围为20±2.8岁(平均21.2岁)。回应率为64.1%。在问题类型和批判性思维得分之间发现显着正相关,其中MCQ(r = .82)和作文问题(r = .77)的相关性最强。在分析,评估,推理和归纳推理中,可以看到多响应格式测试与CCTST的分量表之间存在显着的正相关。与CCTST分量表不同,多响应格式测试与CCTST总分的相关性较弱(r = .45,p = .06)。结论:本研究强调了使用开放式和封闭式回答问题,在评估医学生的批判性思维能力时考虑采用多回答格式测试的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号