...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparative Study on Genotypic and Phenotypic Second-Line Drug Resistance Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolates
【24h】

Comparative Study on Genotypic and Phenotypic Second-Line Drug Resistance Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolates

机译:结核分枝杆菌复合菌株基因型和表型二线耐药性检测的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The mycobacterium growth indicator tube (MGIT960) automated liquid medium testing method is becoming the international gold standard for second-line drug susceptibility testing of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. We performed a comparative study of the current gold standard in the Netherlands, the Middlebrook 7H10 agar dilution method, the MGIT960 system, and the GenoType MTBDRsl genotypic method for rapid screening of aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance. We selected 28 clinical multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant M. tuberculosis complex strains and M. tuberculosis H37Rv. We included amikacin, capreomycin, moxifloxacin, prothionamide, clofazimine, linezolid, and rifabutin in the phenotypic test panels. For prothionamide and moxifloxacin, the various proposed breakpoint concentrations were tested by using the MGIT960 method. The MGIT960 method yielded results 10 days faster than the agar dilution method. For amikacin, capreomycin, linezolid, and rifabutin, results obtained by all methods were fully concordant. Applying a breakpoint of 0.5 μg/ml for moxifloxacin led to results concordant with those of both the agar dilution method and the genotypic method. For prothionamide, concordance was noted only at the lowest and highest MICs. The phenotypic methods yielded largely identical results, except for those for prothionamide. Our study supports the following breakpoints for the MGIT960 method: 1 μg/ml for amikacin, linezolid, and clofazimine, 0.5 μg/ml for moxifloxacin and rifabutin, and 2.5 μg/ml for capreomycin. No breakpoint was previously proposed for clofazimine. For prothionamide, a division into susceptible, intermediate, and resistant seems warranted, although the boundaries require additional study. The genotypic assay proved a reliable and rapid method for predicting aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance.
机译:分枝杆菌生长指示管(MGIT960)自动化液体培养基检测方法已成为对多药和广泛耐药性结核分枝杆菌复杂菌株进行二线药敏试验的国际金标准。我们对荷兰当前的金标准,Middlebrook 7H10琼脂稀释方法,MGIT960系统和GenoType MTBDR sl 基因型方法进行了比较研究,以快速筛选氨基糖苷和氟喹诺酮耐药性。我们选择了28种临床多药和广泛耐药性 M。结核病复杂菌株和 M。结核 H37Rv。在表型测试小组中,我们包括了丁胺卡那霉素,卡普霉素,莫西沙星,乙硫酰胺,氯氟嗪明,利奈唑胺和利福布汀。对于丙硫酰胺和莫西沙星,使用MGIT960方法测试了各种建议的断点浓度。 MGIT960方法的结果比琼脂稀释方法快10天。对于丁胺卡那霉素,卡普霉素,利奈唑胺和利福布汀,通过所有方法获得的结果完全一致。对莫西沙星应用0.5μg/ ml的断点可得到与琼脂稀释法和基因型方法一致的结果。对于乙硫酰胺,仅在最低和最高MIC时才显示出一致性。表型方法产生的结果基本相同,除了乙硫酰胺。我们的研究支持MGIT960方法的以下断点:丁胺卡那霉素,利奈唑胺和氯法齐明1μg/ ml,莫西沙星和利福布汀0.5μg/ ml,以及卡普霉素2.5μg/ ml。以前没有建议氯吡嗪的断点。对于乙硫酰胺,有必要将敏感,中间和耐药分为三类,尽管需要进一步研究。基因型分析证明了预测氨基糖苷和氟喹诺酮耐药性的可靠,快速的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号