首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Two Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis Methods for Molecular Strain Typing of Human Brucella melitensis Isolates from the Middle East
【24h】

Comparison of Two Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Analysis Methods for Molecular Strain Typing of Human Brucella melitensis Isolates from the Middle East

机译:中东人类布鲁氏菌分离株分子菌株分型的两种多位点可变数串联重复分析方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Brucella species are highly monomorphic, with minimal genetic variation among species, hindering the development of reliable subtyping tools for epidemiologic and phylogenetic analyses. Our objective was to compare two distinct multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) subtyping methods on a collection of 101 Brucella melitensis isolates from sporadic human cases of brucellosis in Egypt (n = 83), Qatar (n = 17), and Libya (n = 1). A gel-based MLVA technique, MLVA-15IGM, was compared to an automated capillary electrophoresis-based method, MLVA-15NAU, with each MLVA scheme examining a unique set of variable-number tandem repeats. Both the MLVAIGM and MLVANAU methods were highly discriminatory, resolving 99 and 101 distinct genotypes, respectively, and were able to largely separate genotypes from Egypt and Qatar. The MLVA-15NAU scheme presented higher strain-to-strain diversity in our test population than that observed with the MLVA-15IGM assay. Both schemes were able to genetically correlate some strains originating from the same hospital or region within a country. In addition to comparing the genotyping abilities of these two schemes, we also compared the usability, limitations, and advantages of the two MLVA systems and their applications in the epidemiological genotyping of human B. melitensis strains.
机译: Brucella 物种是高度单态的,物种间的遗传变异极小,这阻碍了流行病学和系统发育分析的可靠亚型分析工具的发展。我们的目的是比较两种不同的多位点可变数目串联重复分析(MLVA)亚型化方法,对埃及散布在人类布鲁氏菌病病例中的101种 Brucella melitensis 分离株( n = 83),卡塔尔( n = 17)和利比亚( n = 1)。将基于凝胶的MLVA技术MLVA-15 IGM 与基于自动毛细管电泳的方法MLVA-15 NAU 进行了比较,每种MLVA方案均检查唯一的一组数目可变的串联重复序列。 MLVA IGM 和MLVA NAU 方法都具有很高的区分性,分别解析了99和101个不同的基因型,并且能够将埃及和卡塔尔的基因型很大程度上区分开。 MLVA-15 NAU 方案在我们的测试人群中呈现出比MLVA-15 IGM 分析更高的菌株间差异。两种方案都能够将来自同一国家同一医院或地区的某些菌株进行遗传关联。除了比较这两种方案的基因分型能力之外,我们还比较了这两种MLVA系统的可用性,局限性和优势,以及它们在人类B流行病学基因分型中的应用。 melitensis 菌株。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号