首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >Engaging Engineering Students in Active Learning and Critical Thinking through Class Debates
【24h】

Engaging Engineering Students in Active Learning and Critical Thinking through Class Debates

机译:通过课堂辩论让工程专业的学生积极学习和进行批判性思维

获取原文
       

摘要

Within the program of engineering, typically there are courses that are heavily dependent on mathematics and derivations of fundamental concepts. A lot of active learning can be done in these classes by using the engineering fundamentals to solve engineering problems, i.e. number crunching. This keeps the students busy and interested in the subject. On the other hand there are some courses that involve a lot of reading and less intense in mathematics. Teaching such courses to engineering students can be a challenge. The objective of this paper is to share an innovative method that not only engages active learning in such classes, but also critical thinking in classes that is text heavy. The pedagogy approach adopted is utilizing the idea of a debate competition between students. The students were given the lecture material by the instructor for several weeks. Student teams are formed and are given the task to prepare Questions and Answers on the topics that have been covered in class. These questions cannot be trivial but has to involve higher levels of the Blooms Taxonomy such as application and analysis. Teams take turn to ask questions to each other and the final score is tabulated. At the end of the process, the instructor will focus on individual team members by giving them similar questions. The objective of this is to identify the weak students within teams and to focus on them before the semester ends. The outcome of this pedagogy exercise was interesting. In comparison to the other semesters, students’ performance increased, besides increasing their interest in the subject. Student survey showed that the enjoyed the methods used in the class and it has really helped them to better understand the material by peer team-working. The innovative pedagogy approached using in this particular engineering course has showed that active learning is an important element in enhancing students’ performance. Besides this, with guidance and examples, students will be able to think in a critical manner on subjects that are text heavy. This is an important element because it develops critical thinking skills in analyzing information. It is recommended that such or similar approaches is adopted for courses that are less mathematics intense in the engineering programs.
机译:在工程计划内,通常有一些课程严重依赖数学和基本概念的推导。通过使用工程基础知识来解决工程问题(即数字运算),可以在这些课程中进行很多积极的学习。这使学生忙于对这个主题感兴趣。另一方面,有些课程涉及很多阅读,而数学的强度较低。向工程专业的学生教授此类课程可能是一个挑战。本文的目的是分享一种创新的方法,该方法不仅可以在此类课堂中进行主动学习,还可以在课文繁重的课堂中进行批判性思维。所采用的教学法是利用学生之间的辩论比赛的思想。讲师为学生提供了数周的讲课材料。组成学生小组,并赋予他们准备课堂上所涉及主题的问答的任务。这些问题并非微不足道,但必须涉及Blooms分类法的更高级别,例如应用程序和分析。各个团队轮流向对方提问,并将最终得分列表化。在该过程的最后,讲师将通过向他们提出类似的问题来专注于单个团队成员。这样做的目的是确定团队中的弱势学生,并在学期结束前集中精力。这种教学法的结果很有趣。与其他学期相比,除了对科目的兴趣增强以外,学生的表现也有所提高。学生调查显示,他们喜欢课堂上使用的方法,并且确实帮助他们通过同伴团队的合作更好地理解了材料。在该特殊工程课程中采用的创新教学法表明,主动学习是提高学生表现的重要因素。除此之外,借助指导和示例,学生将能够以批判的方式思考课文繁重的主题。这是一个重要元素,因为它在分析信息时会培养批判性思维能力。建议对工程程序中数学强度较低的课程采用此类或类似方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号