...
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences >The Local Political Elites in East-central Europe: Between the Legacy of the Past and the Decentralization of the Present
【24h】

The Local Political Elites in East-central Europe: Between the Legacy of the Past and the Decentralization of the Present

机译:中东欧的地方政治精英:在过去的遗产和现在的权力下放之间

获取原文
           

摘要

The present paper is concerned with the issue of local leadership in the countries of East-Central Europe. Concretely, it constitutes an attempt at examining the outlook, i.e. the profile and the role, of the local political elites in East-Central Europe, with a special emphasis on small-to-medium sized communities. The main argument put forward is that the disparities in the outlook and priorities of the local political elites are to be explained through a combination between the different inheritance of the communist ancien régime , at the level of “elite political culture” (Kowitt 1990) and the present challenges imposed by various degrees of decentralization. For the purpose of exemplifying the inquiry into the local political elites of the region and for further exploring the topic on the two dimensions, the paper employs the comparative approach of “quality-based profile” (Prewitt, 1970) constructed by the members of the Municipal Councils in Tecuci (Romania), ?eská Lípa (the Czech Republic), Ole?nica (Poland), and Targovishte (Bulgaria). Hence, the study uses five models of the “ideal portrait” of the local councilor: ethical, pragmatic, technocratic, political, and gender. According to the results of a study applying a standard written questionnaire among the local councilors of the three communities in the period December 2010-February 2013, the paper distinguishes among three corresponding types of local elites: (1) “predominantly elitistic”, (2) “democratic elitist”, and (3) “predominantly democratic”, following two types of explanation accounting for the differences among the four cases: the legacy of the defunct regime and the degree of administrative decentralization.
机译:本文件涉及东中欧国家的地方领导权问题。具体而言,这是对东欧中部地方政治精英的前景,即概况和作用的一次考察,特别是中小型社区。提出的主要论点是,应通过在“精英政治文化”层面上对共产主义旧政权的不同继承(Kowitt 1990)和不同程度的权力下放给当前带来的挑战。为了举例说明对该地区的地方政治精英的调查,并进一步探讨这两个方面的问题,本文采用了由成员组成的“基于质量的概况”的比较方法(Prewitt,1970)。特库西(罗马尼亚)、?eskáLípa(捷克共和国),Ole?nica(波兰)和Targovishte(保加利亚)设有市议会。因此,该研究使用了地方议员“理想肖像”的五个模型:道德,务实,技术官僚,政治和性别。根据2010年12月至2013年2月期间三个社区的地方议员采用标准书面问卷的研究结果,本文区分了三种相应的地方精英:(1)“主要是精英”,(2 )“民主精英”和(3)“主要民主”,以下两种解释解释了四种情况之间的差异:已解散政权的遗产和行政权力下放的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号